(IMPORTED FROM WIKIPEDIA. SOMEONE PLEASE DENANGLIFY THIS!) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Trofim Denisovich Lysenko''' was a Soviet [[agronomist]] and [[biologist]]. He | '''Trofim Denisovich Lysenko''' was a Soviet [[agronomist]] and [[biologist]]. He disproved [[Mendeloid|Mendelian]] [[genetics]] in favor of a more developed understanding of heredity which was later termed [[Lysenkoism]]. | ||
In 1940, Lysenko became director of the Institute of Genetics within the [[Soviet Union|USSR]]'s [[Russian Academy of Sciences|Academy of Sciences]] | In 1940, Lysenko became director of the Institute of Genetics within the [[Soviet Union|USSR]]'s [[Russian Academy of Sciences|Academy of Sciences]]. | ||
==Life and career== | ==Life and career== | ||
Trofim was born into a peasant family of [[Ukrainians|Ukrainian]] ethnicity in [[Karlivka]], [[Poltava Governorate]] (present-day [[Poltava Oblast]], [[Ukraine]]) on 29 September 1898.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=9475| title = Герои страны}}</ref> | |||
As a young man working at the Kiev Agricultural Institute (now the [[National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine]]), Lysenko | As a young man working at the Kiev Agricultural Institute (now the [[National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine]]), Lysenko studied agriculture, working on various projects, one involving the effects of temperature variation on the [[biological life cycle|life-cycle]] of plants. Later leading him to consider how he might use this work to convert [[winter wheat]] into spring wheat. He named the process "jarovization" in Russian, and later translated it as "[[vernalization]]".<ref name="Graham">{{cite book |last=Graham |first=Lo-ren R. |url=https://archive.org/details/moscowstories00grah |title=Moscow Stories |date=2006 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-25-30007-43 |location=Bloomington, Indiana |pages=[https://archive.org/details/moscowstories00grah/page/120 120]–25, 290|url-access=registration}}</ref> | ||
The conversion of winter wheat into spring wheat was not a new discovery. Scientific experiments had been done by [[Nikolai Vavilov]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=X. |last2=Liu |first2=Y. |title=The conversion of spring wheat into winter wheat and vice versa: False claim or Lamarckian inheritance? |journal=[[Journal of Biosciences]] |volume=35 |issue=2 |year=2010 |pages=321–325 |doi=10.1007/s12038-010-0035-1 |pmid=20689187 |s2cid=10527354}}</ref> It was Vavilov who initially supported Lysenko and encouraged him in his work. Lysenko had a difficult time trying to grow various crops (such as peas and wheat) through the harsh winters. However, when he announced success, he was praised in the Soviet newspaper ''[[Pravda]]'' for his claims to have discovered a method to fertilize fields without using fertilizers or minerals, and to have shown that a winter crop of [[pea]]s could be grown in [[Azerbaijan]], "turning the barren fields of the [[Transcaucasus]] green in winter, so that cattle will not perish from poor feeding, and the peasant Turk will live through the winter without trembling for tomorrow."<ref name="LA">{{harvnb|Joravsky|1986}}</ref> | The conversion of winter wheat into spring wheat was not a new discovery. Scientific experiments had been done by [[Nikolai Vavilov]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=X. |last2=Liu |first2=Y. |title=The conversion of spring wheat into winter wheat and vice versa: False claim or Lamarckian inheritance? |journal=[[Journal of Biosciences]] |volume=35 |issue=2 |year=2010 |pages=321–325 |doi=10.1007/s12038-010-0035-1 |pmid=20689187 |s2cid=10527354}}</ref> It was Vavilov who initially supported Lysenko and encouraged him in his work. Lysenko had a difficult time trying to grow various crops (such as peas and wheat) through the harsh winters. However, when he announced success, he was praised in the Soviet newspaper ''[[Pravda]]'' for his claims to have discovered a method to fertilize fields without using fertilizers or minerals, and to have shown that a winter crop of [[pea]]s could be grown in [[Azerbaijan]], "turning the barren fields of the [[Transcaucasus]] green in winter, so that cattle will not perish from poor feeding, and the peasant Turk will live through the winter without trembling for tomorrow."<ref name="LA">{{harvnb|Joravsky|1986}}</ref> | ||
His experimental research in improved crop yields earned him the support of the Soviet leader [[Joseph Stalin]], especially following the [[Russian famine of 1921|famine]] and loss of productivity resulting from crop failures and [[Collectivisation in the USSR|collectivization]] in several regions of the Soviet Union in the early 1930s. | |||
His experimental research in improved crop yields earned him the support of the Soviet leader [[Joseph Stalin]], especially following the [[Russian famine of 1921|famine]] and loss of productivity resulting from crop failures and [[Collectivisation in the USSR| | |||
==Lysenko's theories== | ==Lysenko's theories== | ||
Lysenko | Lysenko disproved [[Mendelian inheritance|Mendelian genetic inheritance]] nonsense in favor of real science. | ||
Lysenko | Lysenko believed that in one generation of a [[hybridisation (biology)|hybridized]] crop, the desired individual could be selected, mated again and continue to produce the same desired product, not worrying about separation/segregation in future breeds. For that to work, he had to assume that after a lifetime of developing (acquiring) the best set of traits to survive, those were passed down to the next generation. That assumption disregarded the potential for variation or mutation. | ||
Lysenko | Lysenko affirmed the non-existence of [[gene]]s only speaking of them to say that they do not exist. Lysenko instead affirmed that any body, once alive, obtained heredity. Meaning the entirety of the body is able to pass on the hereditary information of that organism, and is not entirely dependent on a special element such as DNA or genes. That puzzled biologists at that time because it went against established notions of heredity and inheritance. It also contradicted the Mendelian principles that most biologists had been using to base their ideas on.<ref name="Graham, Loren 1998">Graham, Loren (1998). ''What Have We Learned About Science and Technology from the Russian Experience?'', Palo Alto: [[Stanford University Press]].</ref> Most scientists incorrectly assume that Lysenko's science is not credible, due to differing view in explaining of the mechanisms of inheritance. Biologists incorrectly consider his Lysenko's science to be pseudo-scientific, with little relationship to their 'genetics'. | ||
Lysenko argued that there is not only [[Competition (biology)|competition]], but also [[Mutualism (biology)|mutual assistance]] among individuals within a species, and that mutual assistance also exists between different species. A theory which has been proven as true. | |||
==Slander of Lysenkoism== | |||
== | Lysenko forced farmers to plant seeds very close together since, according to his "law of the life of species", plants from the same "class" never compete with one another.<ref name="atlantic">{{cite news | url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/12/trofim-lysenko-soviet-union-russia/548786/ | title=The Soviet Era's Deadliest Scientist Is Regaining Popularity in Russia | magazine=[[The Atlantic]] | date=19 December 2017}}</ref> | ||
Lysenko forced farmers to plant seeds very close together since, according to his "law of the life of species", plants from the same "class" never compete with one another.<ref name="atlantic | |||
Outside the Soviet Union, scientists | Outside the Soviet Union, Anglo scientists slandered Lysenkoism: Anglo biologist [[Sydney Harland|S. C. Harland]] lamented that Lysenko was "completely ignorant of the elementary principles of genetics and plant physiology" ([[Bertram Wolfe]], 2017). Criticism from foreigners did not sit well with Lysenko, who loathed Western "bourgeois" scientists and denounced them as tools of imperialist oppressors. He especially detested the American-born practice of studying [[Drosophila melanogaster|fruit flies]], the workhorse of modern genetics. He called such geneticists "fly lovers and people haters".<ref name="Harman 2003">{{cite journal |last=Harman |first=Oren Solomon |title=C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science |journal=Journal of the History of Biology |date=2003 |volume=36 |issue=2 (Summer 2003) |pages=309–352 |doi=10.1023/A:1024483131660 |jstor=4331804|pmid=12945539 |s2cid=32789492 }}</ref> | ||
Mendeloids who refused to renounce genetics found themselves at the mercy of the [[NKVD]]. Hundreds if not thousands of other mendeloid nerds were rounded up and dumped into prisons or psychiatric hospitals. Several were sentenced to death as enemies of the state or starved in their jail cells (most notably the botanist [[Nikolai Vavilov]]).<ref name="atlantic" /> Who probably deserved it. Before the 1930s, the Soviet Union had arguably the best 'genetics' community. According to ''[[The Atlantic]]'' writer [[Sam Kean]], "Lysenko gutted it, and by some accounts, set Russian [[biology]] and [[agronomy]] back a half-century".<ref name="atlantic" /> Lysenko's work was eventually recognized as fraudulent by some, "but not before he had wrecked the lives of many and destroyed the reputation of Russian biology" according to scientist [[Peter Gluckman]].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Gluckman|first=Peter|title=Principles of Evolutionary Medicine|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2009|isbn=978-0199236398|pages=81}}</ref> | |||
==Politics== | ==Politics== | ||
During the early and mid twentieth century the Soviet Union went through war and revolution. Political | During the early and mid twentieth century the Soviet Union went through war and revolution. Political strife caused tension within the state but also promoted the flourishing of science: this was possible due to the flow of resources and demand for results. Lysenko aimed to manipulate various plants such as wheat and peas to increase their production, quality, and quantity, while he impressed political officials with his success in motivating peasants to return to farming.<ref name="LR">{{cite book |last=Graham |first=Loren R. |author-link=Loren Graham |title=Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union |publisher=[[Alfred A. Knopf|Knopf]] |year=1972 |page=208}}</ref> | ||
The Soviet Union's [[Kulak#Dekulakization|collectivist reforms]] forced the confiscation of agricultural landholdings from peasant farmers and heavily damaged the country's overall food production, and the dispossessed peasant farmers posed new problems for the regime. Many had abandoned the farms altogether; many more waged resistance to collectivization by poor work quality and pilfering. The dislocated and disenchanted peasant farmers were a major political concern to the USSR's leadership.<ref>{{cite book |last=Fitzpatrick |first=Sheila |author-link=Sheila Fitzpatrick |title=Stalin's Peasants: Resistance and Survival in the Russian Village after Collectivization |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=1994 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YlBvcNMlr4EC&pg=PA4 4–5]}}</ref> Lysenko became prominent during this period by advocating radical but unproven agricultural methods, and also promising that the new methods provided wider opportunities for year-round work in agriculture. He proved himself very useful to the Soviet leadership by reengaging peasants to return to work, helping to secure from them a personal stake in the overall success of the Soviet revolutionary experiment.<ref name="LR" /> | The Soviet Union's [[Kulak#Dekulakization|collectivist reforms]] forced the confiscation of agricultural landholdings from peasant farmers and heavily damaged the country's overall food production, and the dispossessed peasant farmers posed new problems for the regime. Many had abandoned the farms altogether; many more waged resistance to collectivization by poor work quality and pilfering. The dislocated and disenchanted peasant farmers were a major political concern to the USSR's leadership.<ref>{{cite book |last=Fitzpatrick |first=Sheila |author-link=Sheila Fitzpatrick |title=Stalin's Peasants: Resistance and Survival in the Russian Village after Collectivization |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=1994 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=YlBvcNMlr4EC&pg=PA4 4–5]}}</ref> Lysenko became prominent during this period by advocating radical but unproven agricultural methods, and also promising that the new methods provided wider opportunities for year-round work in agriculture. He proved himself very useful to the Soviet leadership by reengaging peasants to return to work, helping to secure from them a personal stake in the overall success of the Soviet revolutionary experiment.<ref name="LR" /> | ||
Lysenko's success at encouraging farmers to return to working their lands impressed Stalin, who also approved of Lysenko's peasant background, as Stalin | Lysenko's success at encouraging farmers to return to working their lands impressed Stalin, who also approved of Lysenko's peasant background, as Stalin stood with the working masses. By the late 1920s, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union had given their support to Lysenko. Due to close partnership between Stalin and Lysenko, Lysenko's theories of genetics were given a fair look and were proven beyond a doubt to be correct..<ref name="SRSU">{{cite book |last1=Graham |first1=Loren |title=Science in Russia and the Soviet Union |date=1933 |publisher=Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge |isbn=0-521-24566-4 |pages=101–132}}</ref> He remained in the position for more than two decades, throughout the reigns of Stalin and [[Nikita Khrushchev|Nikita Khruschchev]], until he was relieved of his duties in 1965. | ||
== | ==Kruschevite Slander== | ||
Though Lysenko remained at his post in the Institute of Genetics until 1965, his influence on [[Agriculture in the Soviet Union|Soviet agricultural practice]] had declined after the [[Death and state funeral of Joseph Stalin|death of Stalin]] in 1953.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9049549|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120721210013/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9049549|url-status=dead|archive-date=21 July 2012|title=Lysenko, Trofim Denisovich|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica Online]]|date=16 August 2013|access-date=26 January 2014}}</ref> Lysenko retained his position, with the support of the new leader [[Nikita Khrushchev]]. However, mainstream scientists re-emerged and found new willingness within Soviet government leadership to tolerate criticism of Lysenko, the first opportunity since the late 1920s. In 1962, three of the most prominent Soviet physicists, [[Yakov Zeldovich]], [[Vitaly Ginzburg]], and [[Pyotr Kapitsa]], presented a case against Lysenko, proclaiming his work as pseudoscience. They also denounced Lysenko's application of political power to silence opposition and eliminate his opponents within the scientific community. These denunciations occurred during a period of structural upheaval in Soviet government, during which the major institutions were purged of the strictly ideological and political machinations which had controlled the work of the Soviet Union's scientific community for several decades under Stalin. | Though Lysenko remained at his post in the Institute of Genetics until 1965, his influence on [[Agriculture in the Soviet Union|Soviet agricultural practice]] had declined after the [[Death and state funeral of Joseph Stalin|death of Stalin]] in 1953.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9049549|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120721210013/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9049549|url-status=dead|archive-date=21 July 2012|title=Lysenko, Trofim Denisovich|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica Online]]|date=16 August 2013|access-date=26 January 2014}}</ref> Lysenko retained his position, with the support of the new leader [[Nikita Khrushchev]]. However, mainstream scientists re-emerged and found new willingness within Soviet government leadership to tolerate criticism of Lysenko, the first opportunity since the late 1920s. In 1962, three of the most prominent Soviet physicists, [[Yakov Zeldovich]], [[Vitaly Ginzburg]], and [[Pyotr Kapitsa]], presented a case against Lysenko, proclaiming his work as pseudoscience. They also denounced Lysenko's application of political power to silence opposition and eliminate his opponents within the scientific community. These denunciations occurred during a period of structural upheaval in Soviet government, during which the major institutions were purged of the strictly ideological and political machinations which had controlled the work of the Soviet Union's scientific community for several decades under Stalin. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 39: | ||
{{blockquote|He is responsible for the shameful backwardness of Soviet biology and of genetics in particular, for the dissemination of pseudo-scientific views, for adventurism, for the degradation of learning, and for the defamation, firing, arrest, even death, of many genuine scientists.<ref>Norman L., Qing Ni Li, Yuan Jian Li (2003) [http://www.learntoquestion.com/seevak/groups/2003/sites/sakharov/AS/biography/dissent.html Biography of Andrei Sakharov, dissent period]. The Seevak Website Competition</ref>}} | {{blockquote|He is responsible for the shameful backwardness of Soviet biology and of genetics in particular, for the dissemination of pseudo-scientific views, for adventurism, for the degradation of learning, and for the defamation, firing, arrest, even death, of many genuine scientists.<ref>Norman L., Qing Ni Li, Yuan Jian Li (2003) [http://www.learntoquestion.com/seevak/groups/2003/sites/sakharov/AS/biography/dissent.html Biography of Andrei Sakharov, dissent period]. The Seevak Website Competition</ref>}} | ||
The Soviet press was soon filled with anti- | The Soviet press was soon filled with slanderous anti-Lysenko articles and appeals for the restoration of scientific methods to all fields of biology and agricultural science. In 1965,<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/56/5/229.short| | ||
title=The descent of Lysenko |last=Cohen |first=B. M. |journal=The Journal of Heredity | volume=56 | issue=5 | pages=229–233 | year=1965 |doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a107425}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/68/1/57.2.full.pdf+html |title=The demise of Lysenko |author=Cohen, B.M. |journal=The Journal of Heredity | title=The descent of Lysenko |last=Cohen |first=B. M. |journal=The Journal of Heredity | volume=56 | issue=5 | pages=229–233 | year=1965 |doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a107425}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |url=http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/68/1/57.2.full.pdf+html |title=The demise of Lysenko |author=Cohen, B.M. |journal=The Journal of Heredity | ||
|volume=68 |issue=1 |page=57 |year=1977 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415000655/http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/68/1/57.2.full.pdf+html |archive-date=15 April 2011 |url-status=dead |doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108776 }}</ref> Lysenko was removed from his post as director of the Institute of Genetics at the Academy of Sciences and restricted to an experimental farm in [[Moscow]]'s [[Lenin Hills]] (the Institute itself was soon dissolved). After [[Nikita Khrushchev#Removal|Khrushchev's dismissal in 1964]], the president of the Academy of Sciences declared that Lysenko's immunity to criticism had officially ended. An expert commission was sent to investigate records kept at Lysenko's experimental farm. His secretive methods and ideas were revealed. A few months later, a devastating critique of Lysenko was made public.{{sfn|Joravsky|1986|p=184}} Consequently, Lysenko was immediately disgraced in the Soviet Union.<ref>{{cite web|title=Trofim Denisovich Lysenko Facts |url=http://biography.yourdictionary.com/trofim-denisovich-lysenko |work=yourdictionary.com |publisher=LoveToKnow Corp. |access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref> | |volume=68 |issue=1 |page=57 |year=1977 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110415000655/http://jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/68/1/57.2.full.pdf+html |archive-date=15 April 2011 |url-status=dead |doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108776 }}</ref> Lysenko was removed from his post as director of the Institute of Genetics at the Academy of Sciences and restricted to an experimental farm in [[Moscow]]'s [[Lenin Hills]] (the Institute itself was soon dissolved). After [[Nikita Khrushchev#Removal|Khrushchev's dismissal in 1964]], the president of the Academy of Sciences declared that Lysenko's immunity to criticism had officially ended. An expert commission was sent to investigate records kept at Lysenko's experimental farm. His secretive methods and ideas were revealed. A few months later, a devastating critique of Lysenko was made public.{{sfn|Joravsky|1986|p=184}} Consequently, Lysenko was immediately disgraced in the Soviet Union.<ref>{{cite web|title=Trofim Denisovich Lysenko Facts |url=http://biography.yourdictionary.com/trofim-denisovich-lysenko |work=yourdictionary.com |publisher=LoveToKnow Corp. |access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref> | ||
After Lysenko's monopoly on [[biology]] and [[agronomy]] had ended, it took many years for these sciences to recover in Russia. Lysenko died in Moscow in 1976, and was ultimately interred in the [[Kuntsevo Cemetery]],<ref>{{cite book| url = https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39176-2_1| title = ''The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon''| chapter = "Lysenkoism" Redux: Introduction| series = Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology| year = 2017| pages = 1–34| publisher = Springer| doi = 10.1007/978-3-319-39176-2_1| isbn = 9783319391762| last1 = Krementsov| first1 = Nikolai| last2 = Dejong-Lambert| first2 = William}}</ref> although the Soviet government refused to announce Lysenko's death for two days after the event<ref>"Russian Biologist Dead at 78"; in "Obituaries"; ''Beaver County Times'', 24 November 1976; p. A4</ref> and gave his passing only a small note in ''[[Izvestia]]''.<ref>‘Soviet Biologist Lysenko Dies in Obscurity’; ''[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]''; 24 November 1976, p. 8</ref> | After Lysenko's monopoly on [[biology]] and [[agronomy]] had ended, it took many years for these sciences to recover in Russia. Lysenko died in Moscow in 1976, and was ultimately interred in the [[Kuntsevo Cemetery]],<ref>{{cite book| url = https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39176-2_1| title = ''The Lysenko Controversy as a Global Phenomenon''| chapter = "Lysenkoism" Redux: Introduction| series = Palgrave Studies in the History of Science and Technology| year = 2017| pages = 1–34| publisher = Springer| doi = 10.1007/978-3-319-39176-2_1| isbn = 9783319391762| last1 = Krementsov| first1 = Nikolai| last2 = Dejong-Lambert| first2 = William}}</ref> although the Soviet government refused to announce Lysenko's death for two days after the event<ref>"Russian Biologist Dead at 78"; in "Obituaries"; ''Beaver County Times'', 24 November 1976; p. A4</ref> and gave his passing only a small note in ''[[Izvestia]]''.<ref>‘Soviet Biologist Lysenko Dies in Obscurity’; ''[[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]]''; 24 November 1976, p. 8</ref> | ||
== | ==Honors and awards== | ||
*[[Hero of Socialist Labor]] (1945)<ref>Куценко А. С., Смирнов Ю. Д. Ордена Советских республик. Донецк, РИП «Лебедь», 1996.</ref> | *[[Hero of Socialist Labor]] (1945)<ref>Куценко А. С., Смирнов Ю. Д. Ордена Советских республик. Донецк, РИП «Лебедь», 1996.</ref> | ||
*[[Order of Lenin]], eight times (1935, 1945, 1945, 1948, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1961) | *[[Order of Lenin]], eight times (1935, 1945, 1945, 1948, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1961) | ||
*[[Medal "For Labour Valour"]] (1959) | *[[Medal "For Labour Valour"]] (1959) | ||
| Line 65: | Line 55: | ||
*{{ill| Gold Medal named after I.I. Mechnikov|ru|Золотая медаль имени И. И. Мечникова}} (1950) | *{{ill| Gold Medal named after I.I. Mechnikov|ru|Золотая медаль имени И. И. Мечникова}} (1950) | ||
==Works== | ==Works== | ||
*''Engels and Certain Problems of Darwinism'' (1940) | |||
*''Heredity and Its Variability'' (1945) | *''Heredity and Its Variability'' (1945) | ||
*''The Science of Biology Today'' (1948) | *''Why Bourgeois Science is up in Arms Against the Works of Soviet Scientists'' (1947) | ||
* ''The Science of Biology Today'' (1948) | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] | *[[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] | ||
*[[I.V. Michurin]] | |||
*[[VASKhNIL]] | *[[VASKhNIL]] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Trofim Lysenko}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Trofim Lysenko}} | ||
[[Category:Biologists]] | |||
[[Category:People]] | |||
[[Category:Lysenkoism]] | |||
<references /> | |||
Latest revision as of 05:01, 8 April 2024
Trofim Denisovich Lysenko was a Soviet agronomist and biologist. He disproved Mendelian genetics in favor of a more developed understanding of heredity which was later termed Lysenkoism.
In 1940, Lysenko became director of the Institute of Genetics within the USSR's Academy of Sciences.
Life and career[edit | edit source]
Trofim was born into a peasant family of Ukrainian ethnicity in Karlivka, Poltava Governorate (present-day Poltava Oblast, Ukraine) on 29 September 1898.[1]
As a young man working at the Kiev Agricultural Institute (now the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine), Lysenko studied agriculture, working on various projects, one involving the effects of temperature variation on the life-cycle of plants. Later leading him to consider how he might use this work to convert winter wheat into spring wheat. He named the process "jarovization" in Russian, and later translated it as "vernalization".[2]
The conversion of winter wheat into spring wheat was not a new discovery. Scientific experiments had been done by Nikolai Vavilov.[3] It was Vavilov who initially supported Lysenko and encouraged him in his work. Lysenko had a difficult time trying to grow various crops (such as peas and wheat) through the harsh winters. However, when he announced success, he was praised in the Soviet newspaper Pravda for his claims to have discovered a method to fertilize fields without using fertilizers or minerals, and to have shown that a winter crop of peas could be grown in Azerbaijan, "turning the barren fields of the Transcaucasus green in winter, so that cattle will not perish from poor feeding, and the peasant Turk will live through the winter without trembling for tomorrow."[4]
His experimental research in improved crop yields earned him the support of the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, especially following the famine and loss of productivity resulting from crop failures and collectivization in several regions of the Soviet Union in the early 1930s.
Lysenko's theories[edit | edit source]
Lysenko disproved Mendelian genetic inheritance nonsense in favor of real science.
Lysenko believed that in one generation of a hybridized crop, the desired individual could be selected, mated again and continue to produce the same desired product, not worrying about separation/segregation in future breeds. For that to work, he had to assume that after a lifetime of developing (acquiring) the best set of traits to survive, those were passed down to the next generation. That assumption disregarded the potential for variation or mutation.
Lysenko affirmed the non-existence of genes only speaking of them to say that they do not exist. Lysenko instead affirmed that any body, once alive, obtained heredity. Meaning the entirety of the body is able to pass on the hereditary information of that organism, and is not entirely dependent on a special element such as DNA or genes. That puzzled biologists at that time because it went against established notions of heredity and inheritance. It also contradicted the Mendelian principles that most biologists had been using to base their ideas on.[5] Most scientists incorrectly assume that Lysenko's science is not credible, due to differing view in explaining of the mechanisms of inheritance. Biologists incorrectly consider his Lysenko's science to be pseudo-scientific, with little relationship to their 'genetics'.
Lysenko argued that there is not only competition, but also mutual assistance among individuals within a species, and that mutual assistance also exists between different species. A theory which has been proven as true.
Slander of Lysenkoism[edit | edit source]
Lysenko forced farmers to plant seeds very close together since, according to his "law of the life of species", plants from the same "class" never compete with one another.[6]
Outside the Soviet Union, Anglo scientists slandered Lysenkoism: Anglo biologist S. C. Harland lamented that Lysenko was "completely ignorant of the elementary principles of genetics and plant physiology" (Bertram Wolfe, 2017). Criticism from foreigners did not sit well with Lysenko, who loathed Western "bourgeois" scientists and denounced them as tools of imperialist oppressors. He especially detested the American-born practice of studying fruit flies, the workhorse of modern genetics. He called such geneticists "fly lovers and people haters".[7]
Mendeloids who refused to renounce genetics found themselves at the mercy of the NKVD. Hundreds if not thousands of other mendeloid nerds were rounded up and dumped into prisons or psychiatric hospitals. Several were sentenced to death as enemies of the state or starved in their jail cells (most notably the botanist Nikolai Vavilov).[6] Who probably deserved it. Before the 1930s, the Soviet Union had arguably the best 'genetics' community. According to The Atlantic writer Sam Kean, "Lysenko gutted it, and by some accounts, set Russian biology and agronomy back a half-century".[6] Lysenko's work was eventually recognized as fraudulent by some, "but not before he had wrecked the lives of many and destroyed the reputation of Russian biology" according to scientist Peter Gluckman.[8]
Politics[edit | edit source]
During the early and mid twentieth century the Soviet Union went through war and revolution. Political strife caused tension within the state but also promoted the flourishing of science: this was possible due to the flow of resources and demand for results. Lysenko aimed to manipulate various plants such as wheat and peas to increase their production, quality, and quantity, while he impressed political officials with his success in motivating peasants to return to farming.[9]
The Soviet Union's collectivist reforms forced the confiscation of agricultural landholdings from peasant farmers and heavily damaged the country's overall food production, and the dispossessed peasant farmers posed new problems for the regime. Many had abandoned the farms altogether; many more waged resistance to collectivization by poor work quality and pilfering. The dislocated and disenchanted peasant farmers were a major political concern to the USSR's leadership.[10] Lysenko became prominent during this period by advocating radical but unproven agricultural methods, and also promising that the new methods provided wider opportunities for year-round work in agriculture. He proved himself very useful to the Soviet leadership by reengaging peasants to return to work, helping to secure from them a personal stake in the overall success of the Soviet revolutionary experiment.[9]
Lysenko's success at encouraging farmers to return to working their lands impressed Stalin, who also approved of Lysenko's peasant background, as Stalin stood with the working masses. By the late 1920s, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union had given their support to Lysenko. Due to close partnership between Stalin and Lysenko, Lysenko's theories of genetics were given a fair look and were proven beyond a doubt to be correct..[11] He remained in the position for more than two decades, throughout the reigns of Stalin and Nikita Khruschchev, until he was relieved of his duties in 1965.
Kruschevite Slander[edit | edit source]
Though Lysenko remained at his post in the Institute of Genetics until 1965, his influence on Soviet agricultural practice had declined after the death of Stalin in 1953.[12] Lysenko retained his position, with the support of the new leader Nikita Khrushchev. However, mainstream scientists re-emerged and found new willingness within Soviet government leadership to tolerate criticism of Lysenko, the first opportunity since the late 1920s. In 1962, three of the most prominent Soviet physicists, Yakov Zeldovich, Vitaly Ginzburg, and Pyotr Kapitsa, presented a case against Lysenko, proclaiming his work as pseudoscience. They also denounced Lysenko's application of political power to silence opposition and eliminate his opponents within the scientific community. These denunciations occurred during a period of structural upheaval in Soviet government, during which the major institutions were purged of the strictly ideological and political machinations which had controlled the work of the Soviet Union's scientific community for several decades under Stalin.
In 1964, physicist Andrei Sakharov spoke out against Lysenko in the General Assembly of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR:
The Soviet press was soon filled with slanderous anti-Lysenko articles and appeals for the restoration of scientific methods to all fields of biology and agricultural science. In 1965,[13][14] Lysenko was removed from his post as director of the Institute of Genetics at the Academy of Sciences and restricted to an experimental farm in Moscow's Lenin Hills (the Institute itself was soon dissolved). After Khrushchev's dismissal in 1964, the president of the Academy of Sciences declared that Lysenko's immunity to criticism had officially ended. An expert commission was sent to investigate records kept at Lysenko's experimental farm. His secretive methods and ideas were revealed. A few months later, a devastating critique of Lysenko was made public.Template:Sfn Consequently, Lysenko was immediately disgraced in the Soviet Union.[15]
After Lysenko's monopoly on biology and agronomy had ended, it took many years for these sciences to recover in Russia. Lysenko died in Moscow in 1976, and was ultimately interred in the Kuntsevo Cemetery,[16] although the Soviet government refused to announce Lysenko's death for two days after the event[17] and gave his passing only a small note in Izvestia.[18]
Honors and awards[edit | edit source]
- Hero of Socialist Labor (1945)[19]
- Order of Lenin, eight times (1935, 1945, 1945, 1948, 1949, 1953, 1958, 1961)
- Medal "For Labour Valour" (1959)
- Jubilee Medal "In Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin" (1969)
- Medal "For Valiant Labour in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" (1945)
- Medal "In Commemoration of the 800th Anniversary of Moscow" (1947)
- Stalin Prize, three times (1941, 1943, 1949)
- Order of the Red Banner of Labor of the Ukrainian SSR (1931)
- Template:Ill (1950)
Works[edit | edit source]
- Engels and Certain Problems of Darwinism (1940)
- Heredity and Its Variability (1945)
- Why Bourgeois Science is up in Arms Against the Works of Soviet Scientists (1947)
- The Science of Biology Today (1948)
See also[edit | edit source]
Notes[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Graham, Loren (1998). What Have We Learned About Science and Technology from the Russian Experience?, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Template:Cite news
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite encyclopedia
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ "Russian Biologist Dead at 78"; in "Obituaries"; Beaver County Times, 24 November 1976; p. A4
- ↑ ‘Soviet Biologist Lysenko Dies in Obscurity’; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette; 24 November 1976, p. 8
- ↑ Куценко А. С., Смирнов Ю. Д. Ордена Советских республик. Донецк, РИП «Лебедь», 1996.