Editing Art

From InfraWiki
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 5: Line 5:
Artists in the past were actually trying to give expression to the entirety of what reality was. They were actually trying to express the truth of universal existence in a way that had not been done before. And if it was done before then art is dead and there's no need for it.
Artists in the past were actually trying to give expression to the entirety of what reality was. They were actually trying to express the truth of universal existence in a way that had not been done before. And if it was done before then art is dead and there's no need for it.


Modern Art is dead. So this is a new era of art which is irreducible to individual works (there's no single picture nor single image, not even a single movie or TV show that suffices to constitute a work of art.)<ref>https://youtu.be/-q_MXJ1UVdg?si=775i6xVCNdrX-Vpe&t=855</ref> In this new era, art exists as artistic themes taken as a whole, giving expression to reality as an expression of history and truth. Socialist realist art contained the kernel of true modern art. In this way, art is irreversibly socialized, and the mainstream idea of "art" is mass-produced, [[Historical nihilism|historically nihilist]] slop which has no connection to the modern experience of modern humans.
Modern Art is dead. So this is a new era of art which is irreducible to individual works (there's no single picture nor single image, not even a single movie or TV show that suffices to constitute a work of art.<ref>https://youtu.be/-q_MXJ1UVdg?si=775i6xVCNdrX-Vpe&t=855</ref>
 
Whereas in previous stages of artistic expression individual artists gave groundbreaking historical contributions to art, in the modern or current era art becomes an inherently social phenomenon. "High art" on the other hand is reactionary, seeking to return to the traditional means of creation and/or seeking to stagnate the development of the means of creating art.


It is important to understand the concept of Art, to understand AI and AI art: AI has no history, culture, discourse, or society. It is just an unprecedented way in which individuals can interface with the total social reality produced by human beings. It is through AI that there is this possibility that all the wealth mankind has produced can be aggregated in a way that is compatible with the humanity of individuals-- their individual human sensibility and taste.<ref>https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1759417512591003667</ref>
It is important to understand the concept of Art, to understand AI and AI art: AI has no history, culture, discourse, or society. It is just an unprecedented way in which individuals can interface with the total social reality produced by human beings. It is through AI that there is this possibility that all the wealth mankind has produced can be aggregated in a way that is compatible with the humanity of individuals-- their individual human sensibility and taste.<ref>https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1759417512591003667</ref>


==== References ====
==== References ====
Please note that all contributions to InfraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Meta:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)