114
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Europa: The Last Battle''' is a ten-part series made by swedish neonazi Tobias Bratt. It is focused on Nazi apologia, historical revisionism and conspiracy theories about jews and communism. It's composed of wholly unfounded and sourceless claims mixed in with known historical facts, which makes it hard for the average person to seperate truth from falsehood. | '''Europa: The Last Battle''' is a ten-part series made by swedish neonazi Tobias Bratt. It is focused on Nazi apologia, historical revisionism and conspiracy theories about jews and communism. It's composed of wholly unfounded and sourceless claims mixed in with known historical facts, which makes it hard for the average person to seperate truth from falsehood. Normally, sourceless claims can be dissmissed without investigation, but since it's widely cited by neonazis on the internet, we have taken it upon ourselfs to take every claim seriously, and investigate it as if it were true. | ||
All good propaganda contains a grain of truth. To lie is very easy, but the truth requires close study. We in the infrared collective are commited to the final and most complete truth. This page will serve as a master page for '''debunking Europa: The Last Battle.''' This time, with real sources. | All good propaganda contains a grain of truth. To lie is very easy, but the truth requires close study. We in the infrared collective are commited to the final and most complete truth. This page will serve as a master page for '''debunking Europa: The Last Battle.''' This time, with real sources. | ||
==== Part 1 ==== | ==== Part 1 ==== | ||
'''Claim''' (02:22): ''"in the middle of the 19th century Moses Hess formulated the first written principles for communism"'' This claim is loosly based on Hess association with Marx and Engels, and Moses view that history will culminate in the introduction of common property,<ref>https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf"Our era strives towards equality – this cannot be denied; but [does this imply] that it is headed immediately towards the community of property? Let this happen one day in the future, let it be the last goal of ageing mankind."</ref> formulated in his Spinozist book ''Die heilige Geschichte der Menschheit'' ( | '''Claim''' (02:22): ''"in the middle of the 19th century Moses Hess formulated the first written principles for communism"'' This claim is loosly based on Hess association with Marx and Engels, and Moses view that history will culminate in the introduction of common property,<ref>https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf"Our era strives towards equality – this cannot be denied; but [does this imply] that it is headed immediately towards the community of property? Let this happen one day in the future, let it be the last goal of ageing mankind."</ref> formulated in his Spinozist book ''Die heilige Geschichte der Menschheit'' (1837), which had no explicit mention of communism. Hess was, however, not the first person to argue for the abolition of private property, nor the first to formulate a political platform with the word communism, neither was he the first person to use the word communism. It's real origins stem from people and groups arguing for a communal organisation of society in France and England during the mid 19th century, ''Commun, Communion'' and ''community.'' It can not be pinned to one person.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20201218153511/http://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/1385668/2a0d6d0b045feef2adb6ae76ec9a2c92.pdf?1509502303</ref> First attested in writing - meaning '''first record of political principles''' - by John Goodwin Barmby in 1841, founder of the utopian, christian, London Communist Propaganda Society.<ref>https://www.etymonline.com/word/communism</ref> People arguing for the abolition of private property (as Engels put it, the meaning of communism in one sentence), predated the 19th century. For example the French Catholic abbé Jean Meslier's ''Testament'' (1729) '''Verdict''': False | ||
'''Claim''' (03:09): "Hess argued that the international jewish bankers will help in his realisation of stealing the land of the palestinians" | '''Claim''' (03:09): "Hess argued that the international jewish bankers will help in his realisation of stealing the land of the palestinians" | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf</ref> Working together on the newspaper. Marx early writings are available here,<ref>https://files.libcom.org/files/Marx-Early-Writings.pdf</ref> where he slowely lands in the conclusion of communism, from an entirely different angle, an economical, than Hess. '''Verdict''': | https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf</ref> Working together on the newspaper. Marx early writings are available here,<ref>https://files.libcom.org/files/Marx-Early-Writings.pdf</ref> where he slowely lands in the conclusion of communism, from an entirely different angle, an economical, than Hess. '''Verdict''': | ||
'''Claim''' (06:40): ''Marx openly encouraged genocide against slavs, referring to them as "racial trash"''. There is absolutely zero record of this. He would routinely critique precisely such racial incitements<ref>This was done not in order to reconcile us with the other provinces, but to stir up hatred between the provinces and to '''exploit''' the '''national enmity''' between the '''Germans''' and '''Slavs''', and the regional hatred of every petty German province against all the neighboring provinces, '''in the interests of patriarchal feudal despotism'''. Divide et impera! | '''Claim''' (06:40): ''Marx openly encouraged genocide against slavs, referring to them as "racial trash"''. There is absolutely zero record of this. He would routinely critique precisely such racial incitements.<ref>This was done not in order to reconcile us with the other provinces, but to stir up hatred between the provinces and to '''exploit''' the '''national enmity''' between the '''Germans''' and '''Slavs''', and the regional hatred of every petty German province against all the neighboring provinces, '''in the interests of patriarchal feudal despotism'''. Divide et impera! | ||
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Articles_from_the_NRZ.pdf</ref> '''Verdict:''' False. | https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Articles_from_the_NRZ.pdf</ref> We can nonetheless note that Marx and Engels were both racist, antisemitic and sexist in private communication. '''Verdict:''' False. | ||
'''Claim''' (06:45): ''"Marx said that [slavs] must perish in a revolutionary holocaust (in 1856)"'' The quote shown on screen is as follows: "the classes and races too weak to master the new conditions of life must give away... They must perish in a revolutionary holocaust." The first part is a real quote, from 1853, not 1856. So close! Marx is commenting on the refugees of poor farmers from Ireland due to the negative effects off industrialisation. He sees these negative effects as an inevitable part of capitalist modernisation, so he is, in his own mind, not arguing for anything.<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1853/03/04.htm"Society is undergoing a silent revolution, which must be submitted to, and which takes no more notice of the human existences it breaks down than an earthquake regards the houses it subverts. The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way."</ref> The second part is completely fictional, perhaps it was revealed to Tobias B. in a dream. '''Verdict:''' False | '''Claim''' (06:45): ''"Marx said that [slavs] must perish in a revolutionary holocaust (in 1856)"'' The quote shown on screen is as follows: "the classes and races too weak to master the new conditions of life must give away... They must perish in a revolutionary holocaust." The first part is a real quote, from 1853, not 1856. So close! Marx is commenting on the refugees of poor farmers from Ireland due to the negative effects off industrialisation. He sees these negative effects as an inevitable part of capitalist modernisation, so he is, in his own mind, not arguing for anything.<ref>https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1853/03/04.htm"Society is undergoing a silent revolution, which must be submitted to, and which takes no more notice of the human existences it breaks down than an earthquake regards the houses it subverts. The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way."</ref> The second part is completely fictional, perhaps it was revealed to Tobias B. in a dream. '''Verdict:''' False |