Malthusianism

Malthusianism is an ideology that claims that the exponential growth of the human population will lead to economic collapse. The idea comes from Thomas Robert Malthus who was hired by the British Royal Family to falsely claim that the causes of the French Revolution was due to population growth, rather than class conflict.

This ideology has become the basis of the degrowth movement and climate activists, who receive enormous funding from the ruling elites.

In contrast to Malthusianism, pro-growth Marxists (such as Deng Xiaoping) propose that humanity is not constrained in the same way as animals are when it comes to their population growth. Lyndon LaRocuhe expresses this ability to increase the human population with technology as the "Potential Relative Population Density."

Marx and Engels were major critics of Malthusian population theory. Marx characterised Malthus' Essay on Population as "nothing more than a schoolboyish, superficial plagiary of De Foe, Sir James Steuart, Townsend, Franklin, Wallace, &c., [it] does not contain a single sentence thought out by himself." Though they accepted natural selection and other elements of Darwinism, they rejected the influence Malthus had on both The Origin of Species and Darwin's work in general.

Engels wrote in 1843:

Malthus establishes a formula on which he bases his entire system: population is said to increase in a geometrical progression – 1+2+4+8+16+32, etc.; the productive power of the land in an arithmetical progression – 1+2+3+4+5+6. The difference is obvious, is terrifying; but is it correct? Where has it been proved that the productivity of the land increases in an arithmetical progression? The extent of land is limited. All right! The labour-power to be employed on this land-surface increases with population. Even if we assume that the increase in yield due to increase in labour does not always rise in proportion to the labour, there still remains a third element which, admittedly, never means anything to the economist – science – whose progress is as unlimited and at least as rapid as that of population. What progress does the agriculture of this century owe to chemistry alone – indeed, to two men alone, Sir Humphry Davy and Justus Liebig! But science increases at least as much as population.

This split later became a sharpened contradiction with the rise of Mendelism-Morganism, which was viscerally critiqued by Trofim Lysenko, the infamous Soviet agronomist. While the Mendelist-Morganists promoted Metaphysical concepts such as genes and random mutation from their sterilized, controlled, cobweb-ridden laboratories, Lysenko experimented in the fields barefoot with Soviet farmers and used Dialectical Materialism as the basis of his scientific method. Lysenko, his colleagues, and their teacher (the agronomist I.V. Michurin) arguably synthesized what is now commonly accepted as epigenetics.

Fox Green of the Space Commune has made a documentary called "Consumerism: Can we buy a better world?" which offers a critique of degrowth and Malthusianism.

Elite Malthusian agenda

Along with direct statements from elites associated with Malthusian organizations like the World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, Planned Parenthood, etc., etc., we now have a number of documents that have come to light since the 70s showing that the elites have long sought to lower the birth rate and the population, both of America and the world in general.

1969 Planned Parenthood "Jaffe memo"

Summary included in the memo of anti-natalist proposals

Frederick S. Jaffe was associated with Planned Parenthood from 1954 to 1974 and was Vice President for much of that time. In 1969 he sent a memo to Bernard Berelson, head of the Rockefeller-funded Population Council, proposing that the potential effectiveness of a number of plans to reduce the population growth to 0% be studied. He and his fellow Malthusians wanted to reduce America's population growth both for the agenda in itself, and because he thought it was necessary to do so, so that the government could "compel" developing nations to do the same, although he recognized the first was easier to practically advocate for. He proposed that first off, the effectiveness of on-demand abortion and contraception be studied and what kind of legal, political, etc. changes would need to be made to provide these. If abortion and contraception alone wouldn't reduce the population growth rate, he proposed that a number of other policies be studied, like:

1. Whether welfare and free social services are pro or anti natalist, and what changes would need to be made accordingly
2. What kind of economic policies would be needed to increase women's employment & thus lower fertility
3. "The effect on fertility of policies to encourage higher educational levels for everyone", and the current and potential effects on fertility of policies and programs regarding the education of women
4. Whether or not the U.S farm policy "of encouraging the amalgamation of family farms into 'agrobusinesses'" has been effective (and if not, what farm policies could be adopted to destroy family farms, and by implication lower fertility by causing rural-urban migration)
5. If home ownership causes higher fertility, and if so, what alternate policies could be adopted
6. How to convince business leaders that lower fertility wouldn't harm their bottom line

He then summed up a number of policies that had been proposed by others, which can be seen in the image to the right, in terms of how applicable they were, and proposed studying (and implementing) these too. Most frightening are "Encourage increased homosexuality" and "Fertility control agents in water supply". The fact that Malthusians had it in mind to encourage homosexuality is interesting in light of the Kissinger Report, as it sheds light on why the U.S encourages the LGBT movement worldwide. While there are many reasons, like reenforcing U.S cultural norms, lowering fertility (and thus the threat to unipolarity) must be one of them.

Deboonkers like to point out that he was only proposing that a number of studies be conducted and summing up proposals made by others, but this doesn't actually matter much. His agenda was clearly to "identify some points for intervention to encourage lower fertility without the adoption of an explicit population policy.", and then to work towards enacting these, and the memo clearly lays out what sorts of plans the Malthusians have adopted.

1974 "Kissinger Report"

The elites also attacked the pre-V2 Catholic Church for its natalist policy, relented after a brief intermission where it seemed possible the Church would support abortion and contraception like mainline Protestant churches had begun to, but ramped up the attack again after Humanae Vitae was issued in 1968, a repudiation of the elite Malthusian agenda. Since then, they've tried to infiltrate the Church and spread their ideas through liberal "Catholicism".

See also

• Club of Rome