(grammatical errors fixed) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In dialectics, "i'''mmediacy'''" refers to the direct and unmediated experience, in the case of humans. Ontologically, this term refers to a "simple", unmediated state of | In dialectics, "i'''mmediacy'''" refers to the direct and unmediated experience, in the case of humans. Ontologically, this term refers to a "simple", unmediated state of [[Being]]. | ||
A person might be different in his ethnicity but he would care about his host country because he and everyone else in the particular country experiences things "immediately". | A person might be different in his ethnicity but he would care about his host country because he and everyone else in the particular country experiences things "immediately". | ||
Another example of "immediacy" is Shakespeare's works, which are essentially an "immediate presentation", as Dryden had said of Shakespeare's dramas that he drew from nature "not laboriously but luckily" which leads to a body of work which is not mediated and has universal aspects to it. | Another example of "immediacy" is Shakespeare's works, which are essentially an "immediate presentation", as Dryden had said of Shakespeare's dramas that he drew from nature "not laboriously but luckily" which leads to a body of work which is not mediated and has universal aspects to it. | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 26 March 2024
In dialectics, "immediacy" refers to the direct and unmediated experience, in the case of humans. Ontologically, this term refers to a "simple", unmediated state of Being.
A person might be different in his ethnicity but he would care about his host country because he and everyone else in the particular country experiences things "immediately".
Another example of "immediacy" is Shakespeare's works, which are essentially an "immediate presentation", as Dryden had said of Shakespeare's dramas that he drew from nature "not laboriously but luckily" which leads to a body of work which is not mediated and has universal aspects to it.