(Created page with "For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say the material world they mean the substance substantial world because by material they are not referring to this kind of mystical real and whatever they're referring to a material always already and un-dialectically latent with form.") |
(grammatical errors fixed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say the material world they mean the | For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say "the material world" they mean the substantial world. By material they are not referring to this kind of "mystical real" or whatever; they're referring to a material always, already, and, un-dialectically latent with form. | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 26 March 2024
For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say "the material world" they mean the substantial world. By material they are not referring to this kind of "mystical real" or whatever; they're referring to a material always, already, and, un-dialectically latent with form.