Libertarian Stalinism: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Libertarian Stalinism''' is a political alignment which posits that one of the potential revolutionary agents in the United States could be the Libertarian movement, considering their counter-hegemonic position against the current U.S. Government.<ref>"The only revolutionary position in the United States is Libertarianism" [https://youtu.be/wLf4dKcFCFo?t=492 8:12 of Why I'm a Libertarian Stalinist] by [[Haz Al-Din|Haz]] of [[Infrared]] on [[YouTube]]</ref> This is contrast to the current orientation of the revisionist CPUSA which tails behind the Democratic Party and the existing institutional hegemony.   
'''Libertarian Stalinism''' is a political strategy according to which the expansion of the imperialist state machine is in fact reactionary.
 
In contrast to the traditional Marxist view, which advocates for minimal reforms as the vehicle to accentuate the contradictions within the ultimate revolutionary strategy, the 'Libertarian Stalinist' view holds that the imperialist state machine must be smashed, and to that end, common ground can be found with the aims of libertarians.
 
The view holds that only after the smashing of the imperialist state machine, can it be possible to build a proletarian dictatorship. Thus agitation for increased welfare programs and government spending is inherently counter-productive.
 
It also regards broad, spontaneous libertarian sentient among the masses as inherently counter-hegemonic. This is as opposed to leftism, which is firmly entrenched within the imperialist hegemony and seeks to utilize the institutions of imperialism in order to build socialism. "The only revolutionary position in the United States is Libertarianism" [https://youtu.be/wLf4dKcFCFo?t=492 8:12 of Why I'm a Libertarian Stalinist] by [[Haz Al-Din|Haz]] of [[Infrared]] on [[YouTube]]</ref> This is contrast to the current orientation of the revisionist CPUSA which tails behind the Democratic Party and the existing institutional hegemony.   


This argument is made in the tradition of Leninism, which argues that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery and wield it for its own purposes."<ref>[https://youtu.be/wLf4dKcFCFo Why I'm a Libertarian Stalinist] by [[Haz Al-Din|Haz]] of [[Infrared]] on [[YouTube]]</ref>
This argument is made in the tradition of Leninism, which argues that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery and wield it for its own purposes."<ref>[https://youtu.be/wLf4dKcFCFo Why I'm a Libertarian Stalinist] by [[Haz Al-Din|Haz]] of [[Infrared]] on [[YouTube]]</ref>

Revision as of 03:27, 14 January 2024

Libertarian Stalinism is a political strategy according to which the expansion of the imperialist state machine is in fact reactionary.

In contrast to the traditional Marxist view, which advocates for minimal reforms as the vehicle to accentuate the contradictions within the ultimate revolutionary strategy, the 'Libertarian Stalinist' view holds that the imperialist state machine must be smashed, and to that end, common ground can be found with the aims of libertarians.

The view holds that only after the smashing of the imperialist state machine, can it be possible to build a proletarian dictatorship. Thus agitation for increased welfare programs and government spending is inherently counter-productive.

It also regards broad, spontaneous libertarian sentient among the masses as inherently counter-hegemonic. This is as opposed to leftism, which is firmly entrenched within the imperialist hegemony and seeks to utilize the institutions of imperialism in order to build socialism. "The only revolutionary position in the United States is Libertarianism" 8:12 of Why I'm a Libertarian Stalinist by Haz of Infrared on YouTube</ref> This is contrast to the current orientation of the revisionist CPUSA which tails behind the Democratic Party and the existing institutional hegemony.

This argument is made in the tradition of Leninism, which argues that “the working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery and wield it for its own purposes."[1]

References