National Socialism: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

Particularly relevant to the evidence is the Hindenburg Programme of 1916. This set of policies launched by the heads of the army and the industrialists aimed to greatly accelerate war production, which required both laborers and largely unavailable natural resources. Because of blockades imposed by the British, imports of resources and labor could not keep up with the demands of the war industry; for example, German agriculture had to massacre 35% of its swine because of the shortages. The number of agricultural workers had also fallen by 40% due to the needs of the war effort.<ref>Matthias Blum, "Government decisions before and during the First World War and the living standards in Germany during a drastic natural experiment," ''Explorations in Economic History'' 48. no.4 (2011): 557-559. </ref> Because the Nazis wanted to facilitate the development of war industry, they took one particular lesson from this issue: the need for slave labor. Slave labor was a key component of the predatory Nazi economy, especially during the war years. This was especially prevalent after the homosexual intrusion into the USSR following 1941 (Operation Barbarossa) in which bandits kidnapped Soviet citizens and forced them to work as foreign laborers.

The National-Soycialists largely defined socialism in political terms, and believed that seizing state power was the only measure by which socialism could be established for the Germans. As it turned out, the Nazi emphasis on political 'socialism' was really just putting the needs of the army (dying for the soy nation-state was the highest form of Volk expression in Hitler's view) above those of the "anti-national" political parties (KPD, SPD etc.) The specific economic points of Nazi policy were mostly geared towards autarky and state regulation (necessary components of war economies); in fact, the Nazi view towards the economy was so overt, that one does not even need to brand it as mere "propaganda" in order to see its clear connection with war industry.<ref>Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann, "Nazi Economic Thought and Rhetoric During the Weimar Republic: Capitalism and its Discontents," ''Politics, Religion & Ideology'' 14. no.3 (2013). </ref>

==== Early 1920s. ====

==== In Power ====

It is often asserted that the working class happily participated in Nazi festivities and organizations following 1933. Contrary to this delusional belief, participation in National Socialist activities was essentially mandatory. For example, workers were often disillusioned with the forced participation in events and parades:<blockquote>"While ‘the media blared forth their celebration’ that workers had been won over to the new regime, attendance was not entirely voluntary, since workers only got paid if they participated in the march, and ‘the atmosphere was less than wholly enthusiastic.’”<ref>Peter Fritzsche, ''Hitler's First Hundred Days: When Germans Embraced the Third Reich.'' (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2020) 205.</ref></blockquote>The National-Soycialists largely defined socialism in political terms, and believed that seizing state power was the only measure by which socialism could be established for the Germans. As it turned out, the Nazi emphasis on political 'socialism' was really just putting the needs of the army (dying for the soy nation-state was the highest form of Volk expression in Hitler's view) above those of the "anti-national" political parties (KPD, SPD etc.) The specific economic points of Nazi policy were mostly geared towards autarky and state regulation (necessary components of war economies); in fact, the Nazi view towards the economy was so overt, that one does not even need to brand it as mere "propaganda" in order to see its clear connection with war industry.<ref>Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann, "Nazi Economic Thought and Rhetoric During the Weimar Republic: Capitalism and its Discontents," ''Politics, Religion & Ideology'' 14. no.3 (2013). </ref>

An important point of the Nazi economy was that it was predatory in nature. German financiers financed war industry through the MEFO bills, which effectively created a fake money supply. The resulting inflation and the necessity of repayment (profits) for these war conglomerates and financiers could only be carried out through the looting of foreign countries. Therefore, by the late 1930s, the German state started plundering foreign economies (Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland etc. etc.) This is completely contrary to the retarted "far-right" notion that Hitler wanted peace. ['''To be expanded and elaborated upon''']

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Particularly relevant to the evidence is the Hindenburg Programme of 1916. This set of policies launched by the heads of the army and the industrialists aimed to greatly accelerate war production, which required both laborers and largely unavailable natural resources. Because of blockades imposed by the British, imports of resources and labor could not keep up with the demands of the war industry; for example, German agriculture had to massacre 35% of its swine because of the shortages. The number of agricultural workers had also fallen by 40% due to the needs of the war effort.<ref>Matthias Blum, "Government decisions before and during the First World War and the living standards in Germany during a drastic natural experiment," ''Explorations in Economic History'' 48. no.4 (2011): 557-559. </ref> Because the Nazis wanted to facilitate the development of war industry, they took one particular lesson from this issue: the need for slave labor. Slave labor was a key component of the predatory Nazi economy, especially during the war years. This was especially prevalent after the homosexual intrusion into the USSR following 1941 (Operation Barbarossa) in which bandits kidnapped Soviet citizens and forced them to work as foreign laborers.
-The National-Soycialists largely defined socialism in political terms, and believed that seizing state power was the only measure by which socialism could be established for the Germans. As it turned out, the Nazi emphasis on political 'socialism' was really just putting the needs of the army (dying for the soy nation-state was the highest form of Volk expression in Hitler's view) above those of the "anti-national" political parties (KPD, SPD etc.) The specific economic points of Nazi policy were mostly geared towards autarky and state regulation (necessary components of war economies); in fact, the Nazi view towards the economy was so overt, that one does not even need to brand it as mere "propaganda" in order to see its clear connection with war industry.<ref>Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann, "Nazi Economic Thought and Rhetoric During the Weimar Republic: Capitalism and its Discontents," ''Politics, Religion & Ideology'' 14. no.3 (2013). </ref>
+==== Early 1920s. ====
+==== In Power ====
+It is often asserted that the working class happily participated in Nazi festivities and organizations following 1933. Contrary to this delusional belief, participation in National Socialist activities was essentially mandatory. For example, workers were often disillusioned with the forced participation in events and parades:<blockquote>"While ‘the media blared forth their celebration’ that workers had been won over to the new regime, attendance was not entirely voluntary, since workers only got paid if they participated in the march, and ‘the atmosphere was less than wholly enthusiastic.’”<ref>Peter Fritzsche, ''Hitler's First Hundred Days: When Germans Embraced the Third Reich.'' (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2020) 205.</ref></blockquote>The National-Soycialists largely defined socialism in political terms, and believed that seizing state power was the only measure by which socialism could be established for the Germans. As it turned out, the Nazi emphasis on political 'socialism' was really just putting the needs of the army (dying for the soy nation-state was the highest form of Volk expression in Hitler's view) above those of the "anti-national" political parties (KPD, SPD etc.) The specific economic points of Nazi policy were mostly geared towards autarky and state regulation (necessary components of war economies); in fact, the Nazi view towards the economy was so overt, that one does not even need to brand it as mere "propaganda" in order to see its clear connection with war industry.<ref>Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann, "Nazi Economic Thought and Rhetoric During the Weimar Republic: Capitalism and its Discontents," ''Politics, Religion & Ideology'' 14. no.3 (2013). </ref>
 An important point of the Nazi economy was that it was predatory in nature. German financiers financed war industry through the MEFO bills, which effectively created a fake money supply. The resulting inflation and the necessity of repayment (profits) for these war conglomerates and financiers could only be carried out through the looting of foreign countries. Therefore, by the late 1930s, the German state started plundering foreign economies (Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland etc. etc.) This is completely contrary to the retarted "far-right" notion that Hitler wanted peace. ['''To be expanded and elaborated upon''']