Gangsta King: Difference between revisions

Line 19:

In todays age, all forms of sovereignty not carried out in the liberal form are considered malign and illegitimate (which literally means 'not approved by law') in the eyes of the liberal establishment. Some even go so far as to claim that all forms of non-liberal government are fascistic; One example being leftists/anarchists calling the Soviet Union or China red fascist. The more popular one however, is the accusation of authoritarianism or tyranny.

'''Gangsta Kings''' break the rules of liberalism by concentrating their power in non judicial forms, which allows them to challenge and crack down on the oligarchs oppressing the people, dialectically making the average individual more free. The dialectical relationship in question is that centralization on one level neccesserily corresponds to a decentralizaton on the other. In its socialist context the topic has been addressed in the Infrared vision videos: 'Stalin: What They Don't Teach You in School'<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSWhSBmfMA</ref> and The Unknown Cultural Revolution<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gG6zzHy48w&t=</ref>.

'''<nowiki/>'Gangsta Kings'''' break the rules of liberalism by concentrating their power in non judicial forms, which allows them to challenge and crack down on the oligarchs oppressing the people, dialectically making the average individual more free. The dialectical relationship in question is that centralization on one level neccesserily corresponds to a decentralizaton on the other. In its socialist context the topic has been addressed in the Infrared vision videos: 'Stalin: What They Don't Teach You in School'<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSWhSBmfMA</ref> and The Unknown Cultural Revolution<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gG6zzHy48w&t=</ref>.

This class based dialectic is well established in history. Machiavelli mentions in ''The Prince'' how local lords oppress their subjects, while powerful kings can be uplifted by the people as saviours<ref>Machiavelli. ''The Prince''. Chapter IX, X, XXVI.</ref>. In Michael Parentis work ''The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of ancient rome''<nowiki/>', he expands upon the class struggle in ancient rome between the elites and the people, represented by Julius Ceasar.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 In todays age, all forms of sovereignty not carried out in the liberal form are considered malign and illegitimate (which literally means 'not approved by law') in the eyes of the liberal establishment. Some even go so far as to claim that all forms of non-liberal government are fascistic; One example being leftists/anarchists calling the Soviet Union or China red fascist. The more popular one however, is the accusation of authoritarianism or tyranny.
-'''Gangsta Kings''' break the rules of liberalism by concentrating their power in non judicial forms, which allows them to challenge and crack down on the oligarchs oppressing the people, dialectically making the average individual more free. The dialectical relationship in question is that centralization on one level neccesserily corresponds to a decentralizaton on the other. In its socialist context the topic has been addressed in the Infrared vision videos: 'Stalin: What They Don't Teach You in School'<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSWhSBmfMA</ref> and The Unknown Cultural Revolution<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gG6zzHy48w&t=</ref>.
+'''<nowiki/>'Gangsta Kings'''' break the rules of liberalism by concentrating their power in non judicial forms, which allows them to challenge and crack down on the oligarchs oppressing the people, dialectically making the average individual more free. The dialectical relationship in question is that centralization on one level neccesserily corresponds to a decentralizaton on the other. In its socialist context the topic has been addressed in the Infrared vision videos: 'Stalin: What They Don't Teach You in School'<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rSWhSBmfMA</ref> and The Unknown Cultural Revolution<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gG6zzHy48w&t=</ref>.
 This class based dialectic is well established in history. Machiavelli mentions in ''The Prince'' how local lords oppress their subjects, while powerful kings can be uplifted by the people as saviours<ref>Machiavelli. ''The Prince''. Chapter IX, X, XXVI.</ref>. In Michael Parentis work ''The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of ancient rome''<nowiki/>', he expands upon the class struggle in ancient rome between the elites and the people, represented by Julius Ceasar.