Schiller Institute: Difference between revisions

Line 21:

In the main, the conspiracy theory - like Russiagate - is an irrational form of paranoid schizophrenia and mental illness, which is already quite pervasive on the American left. Proponents of this theory cannot forward an actual argument for why they think Infrared is a LaRouchite conspiracy, beyond the fact that Haz Al-Din appeared at a Schiller Institute conference one time.

What is most probably the biggest source of suspicion for this theory is the fact that Schiller Institute members, on account of their basic professionalism (having diplomatic ties to various BRICS governments, including Russia and China), do not make a strong emphasize of differences. They, in contrast to Caleb Maupin, never attacked Infrared publicly, nor made a fuss about ~~our~~ disagreements.

What is most probably the biggest source of suspicion for this theory is the fact that Schiller Institute members, on account of their basic professionalism (having diplomatic ties to various BRICS governments, including Russia and China), do not make a strong emphasize of differences. They, in contrast to Caleb Maupin, never attacked Infrared publicly, nor made a fuss about their disagreements.

They prefer to focus on the areas of agreement, especially on matters pertaining to foreign policy. Toward that end, Infrared appreciates their professional outlook, and also returns the favor by not making a strong point of emphasis on the very real and significant underlying ideological differences.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 In the main, the conspiracy theory - like Russiagate - is an irrational form of paranoid schizophrenia and mental illness, which is already quite pervasive on the American left. Proponents of this theory cannot forward an actual argument for why they think Infrared is a LaRouchite conspiracy, beyond the fact that Haz Al-Din appeared at a Schiller Institute conference one time.
-What is most probably the biggest source of suspicion for this theory is the fact that Schiller Institute members, on account of their basic professionalism (having diplomatic ties to various BRICS governments, including Russia and China), do not make a strong emphasize of differences. They, in contrast to Caleb Maupin, never attacked Infrared publicly, nor made a fuss about our disagreements.
+What is most probably the biggest source of suspicion for this theory is the fact that Schiller Institute members, on account of their basic professionalism (having diplomatic ties to various BRICS governments, including Russia and China), do not make a strong emphasize of differences. They, in contrast to Caleb Maupin, never attacked Infrared publicly, nor made a fuss about their disagreements.
 They prefer to focus on the areas of agreement, especially on matters pertaining to foreign policy. Toward that end, Infrared appreciates their professional outlook, and also returns the favor by not making a strong point of emphasis on the very real and significant underlying ideological differences.