Nazi-Maoism: Difference between revisions
Created page with "A gay retarded ideology that some unnotable people in the Infrared community larped. Currently, if a person was to identify as a nazi-maoist in Infrared, they would be ridiculed and likely kill themself out of embarrassment for doing something so retarded." |
Created/expanded by automated agent (ComradeBanana task) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Nazi-Maoism''' — the 1960s-70s European current (Jean Thiriart, Franco Freda; Terza Posizione, Lutte du Peuple) that fused far-right nationalism with borrowed Maoist rhetoric — appears in Infrared discourse as the '''cautionary precedent''' for any red-brown synthesis. | |||
== The historical current == | |||
* Thiriart's "Europe from Vladivostok to Dublin," Freda's "disruptive" tactics: anti-American, anti-Soviet, anti-Zionist nationalism adopting Third Worldist guerrilla language ("use so-called leftist terminology, provided you modify its meaning"). | |||
* The result: no class content, no workers' organization — nationalism with Maoist aesthetics, collapsing into terrorism or marginal cults. | |||
== Infrared's relation == | |||
MAGA Communism is repeatedly accused of being this. The distinction Haz insists on: | |||
* Nazi-Maoism '''borrowed leftist terminology while modifying its meaning'''; Infrared insists on the actual Marxist content — value theory, class analysis, the party ([[Tendency of the rate of profit to fall]], [[Class]]). | |||
* Nazi-Maoism's nation was racial; Infrared's is political-civilizational, multiethnic by composition ([[Keith Woods]] rivalry marks exactly this boundary). | |||
* The test is organizational: who does the movement organize, and against whom? Workers as a class against finance-capital — or natives against strangers? | |||
The precedent is studied seriously precisely because the temptation it represents is real: patriotism without class analysis always finds its Feder ([[Gottfried Feder]], [[Strasserism]]). | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Red-Fascism]] | |||
* [[European New Right]] | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
[[Category:Fascism]][[Category:Ideology]][[Category:History]] | |||
Revision as of 09:56, 21 August 2026
Nazi-Maoism — the 1960s-70s European current (Jean Thiriart, Franco Freda; Terza Posizione, Lutte du Peuple) that fused far-right nationalism with borrowed Maoist rhetoric — appears in Infrared discourse as the cautionary precedent for any red-brown synthesis.
The historical current
- Thiriart's "Europe from Vladivostok to Dublin," Freda's "disruptive" tactics: anti-American, anti-Soviet, anti-Zionist nationalism adopting Third Worldist guerrilla language ("use so-called leftist terminology, provided you modify its meaning").
- The result: no class content, no workers' organization — nationalism with Maoist aesthetics, collapsing into terrorism or marginal cults.
Infrared's relation
MAGA Communism is repeatedly accused of being this. The distinction Haz insists on:
- Nazi-Maoism borrowed leftist terminology while modifying its meaning; Infrared insists on the actual Marxist content — value theory, class analysis, the party (Tendency of the rate of profit to fall, Class).
- Nazi-Maoism's nation was racial; Infrared's is political-civilizational, multiethnic by composition (Keith Woods rivalry marks exactly this boundary).
- The test is organizational: who does the movement organize, and against whom? Workers as a class against finance-capital — or natives against strangers?
The precedent is studied seriously precisely because the temptation it represents is real: patriotism without class analysis always finds its Feder (Gottfried Feder, Strasserism).