(error rectified) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Transcendence''' is used for the [[Being ('Being' as such)|being]] of [[God]] as though existing apart form and not being subjected to the physical universe or even having no relation to the physical universe. '''Transcendence''' is something which goes ''beyond'', it cannot be realized in [[experience]] or ''some aspect'' of [[experience]]. It is the feature of somehow not being where we are, it is what gives rise to thought, or, [[spirit]] (drawing from [[Evald Ilyenkov|Ilyenkov]].)<ref>https://youtu.be/YuPj14hsRog?si=6emEEP7oZxWJD5Uc&t=232</ref> | '''Transcendence''' is used for the [[Being ('Being' as such)|being]] of [[God]] as though existing apart form and not being subjected to the physical universe or even having no relation to the physical universe. '''Transcendence''' is something which goes ''beyond'', it cannot be realized in [[experience]] or ''some aspect'' of [[experience]]. It is the feature of somehow not being where we are, it is what gives rise to thought, or, [[spirit]] (drawing from [[Evald Ilyenkov|Ilyenkov]].)<ref>https://youtu.be/YuPj14hsRog?si=6emEEP7oZxWJD5Uc&t=232</ref> | ||
'''Transcendence''' is contrasted with [[Immanence|'''immanence''']]. | |||
Revision as of 17:51, 5 May 2024
Transcendence is used for the being of God as though existing apart form and not being subjected to the physical universe or even having no relation to the physical universe. Transcendence is something which goes beyond, it cannot be realized in experience or some aspect of experience. It is the feature of somehow not being where we are, it is what gives rise to thought, or, spirit (drawing from Ilyenkov.)[1]
Transcendence is contrasted with immanence.