The Most EVIL Ideology You've NEVER Heard Of!: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
* The bourgeoisie wants "Civilization" in opposition to the "Asiatic Hordes"  
* The bourgeoisie wants "Civilization" in opposition to the "Asiatic Hordes"  
* [[Carl Schmitt|Schmittian]] "State of Exception" to "keep society open" against the "hordes" which are the masses  
* [[Carl Schmitt|Schmittian]] "State of Exception" to "keep society open" against the "hordes" which are the masses  
* Donation by Hermit: Social Democrats are Open Society Vanguardists
* Donation by Hermit: Are SocDems the Open Society Vanguardists?
** Actually the so-called "communists" these days are, the Synthetic Left et al.
* Marxist-Leninist freedom is determinate (Materialist, nationalist) whereas Open Society "freedom" is freedom to do whatever  
* Marxist-Leninist freedom is determinate (Materialist, nationalist) whereas Open Society "freedom" is freedom to do whatever  
* Deng Xiaoping brings forth a new Platonic "openness" in opposition to Popper's Open Society  
* Deng Xiaoping brings forth a new Platonic "openness" in opposition to Popper's Open Society  

Revision as of 04:06, 11 April 2023

The Most EVIL Ideology You've NEVER Heard Of! is an Infrared live stream from Mon, Apr 10.[1] Wanna keep this project going? Donate on Ko-Fi or Patreon

Notes / outline

  • Discussion about Dalai Lama cringe behavior and how Feudal Tibet is America's future if we don't change course
  • It's unsatisfactory to say that the New Left is the reason the American Synthetic Left is so fucked up
  • Haz argues that Karl Popper is the actual father of the current Synthetic Left and "liberalism in the Information Age"
  • Bourgeois epistemology (theory of truth) and bourgeois politics both begin with blank slates; democracies are empty "forms" filled with the "content" by elections, truth and knowledge is "empty" until proven through scientific method
  • Karl Popper writes Open Societies and its Enemies, which argues against democracy and claims that "the people" are totalitarian etc.
  • This is really about Information Theory
  • Karl Popper rejects democracy which is the will of the people, he instead advocated for "Open Societies" controlled by rigid Institutions which are governed by their own principles
  • This Open Society design is in contrast to populism, majoritarianism, Jeffersonian Democracy, etc.
  • As it relates to epistemology, Popper introduces the idea of falsifiability
  • Popper claims that Marxism is unfalsifiable
  • Haz wishes more Marxists would engage with Popper's writings in order to disprove this claim of his
  • Popper attacks Plato for positing "The Good" which pre-exists its own content, which is thus unfalsifiable because it does not (yet) exist
    • The Good, The Republic, The People, etc. for Hegel, it was the Prussian State and Prussian Statecraft, for Marxist-Leninists it's the Proletariat, for German Nazi scum, it's racial purity. For Americans, it's Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, et al.
  • Popper claims that the notion of The Good is totalitarian, because it's insisted by the human mind, rather than scientific glasses-wearing jibber jabber
  • Book recommendation: Political Platonism by Aleksandr Dugin
  • A village is not an institution, it's an emergent social phenomenon based on actual interaction between people
  • The internet itself is an institutionalizing mechanism, given that all rules are written (code, recommendation algorithms, UX design)
  • The Open Society hates anything which threatens institutions, including small producers and innovators
  • Communism is not when institutions modulate society according to various levers, this is the Karl Popper Open Society situation
  • The Open Society is a Synthetic Society, the true communist path allows The People to build society in their own image, not in some synthetic top-down planned way
  • György Lukács and Popper have in common the ideology of Social Democracy; Institutional socialism, Fabianism, Neo-Kantians
  • The Psychosis of Liberalism; the fascistic tyranny against the intolerant
  • The bourgeoisie wants "Civilization" in opposition to the "Asiatic Hordes"
  • Schmittian "State of Exception" to "keep society open" against the "hordes" which are the masses
  • Donation by Hermit: Are SocDems the Open Society Vanguardists?
    • Actually the so-called "communists" these days are, the Synthetic Left et al.
  • Marxist-Leninist freedom is determinate (Materialist, nationalist) whereas Open Society "freedom" is freedom to do whatever
  • Deng Xiaoping brings forth a new Platonic "openness" in opposition to Popper's Open Society
  • Popper didn't consider that a closed society with a dominant tendency could build exploratory mechanisms for discovering new paths, which is what Deng did.
  • Haz critiques Popper in that the "Open Society" is actually a closed society. The only truly open society is Deng Xiaoping Taliban Stalinism.
  • Populism obviously threatens all these Open Society aims, as we've seen with the hatred of the Colour Revolutions.

References