Substance: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
(Created page with "For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say the material world they mean the substance substantial world because by material they are not referring to this kind of mystical real and whatever they're referring to a material always already and un-dialectically latent with form.")
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say the material world they mean the substance substantial world because by material they are not referring to this kind of mystical real and whatever they're referring to a material always already and un-dialectically latent with form.
For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say "the material world" they mean the substantial world. By material they are not referring to this kind of "mystical real" or whatever; they're referring to a material always, already, and, un-dialectically latent with form.
 
==See Also==
 
[[Essence]]

Latest revision as of 19:34, 24 June 2024

For Spinoza, the substance is a materiality already latent with a form. When many religious scholars and religious thinkers say "the material world" they mean the substantial world. By material they are not referring to this kind of "mystical real" or whatever; they're referring to a material always, already, and, un-dialectically latent with form.

See Also[edit | edit source]

Essence