No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Multi-Polarity''' | '''Multi-Polarity''', the '''Multi-Polar World''', or '''Determinate Globality''' as understood by [[Infrared]], refers to the system of global power and civilization emerging amidst the collapse of American hegemony. | ||
While some take 'multi-polarity' to imply the coexistence of large powers and therefore identify the late 19th century as 'multipolar,' Infrared interprets multi-polarity to refer to a new particularization and regionalization of global hegemony. | |||
Drawing from [[Alexandre Kojève]]'s notion of the 'universal and homogeneous state,' Infrared interprets multi-polarity in the Hegelian sense of the rise of 'determinate universalism,' as opposed to the 'abstract universalism' characteristic of American super-imperialism. Newly emergent regional poles give globalization a concrete and civilizational character, thus corresponding to the rise of states that are simultaneously universal and particular, global, and regional. | |||
Multi-polarity represents the sublation of the global American system into regional forms, that render it superfluous. Hence in the age of multi-polarity, American hegemony begins to assume the form of naked and brute political domination, characterized by the extraordinary use of military force to preserve a state of affairs outmoded by history. This is in contrast to the nascent American super-imperialism ([[Michael Hudson|Hudson]]) of the postwar Bretton-Woods period, which was characterized by the emergence of a unique global economic system based on strategic application of economic developmentalism to select regions in order mitigate the effects of capitalist crisis. |
Latest revision as of 05:01, 17 January 2024
Multi-Polarity, the Multi-Polar World, or Determinate Globality as understood by Infrared, refers to the system of global power and civilization emerging amidst the collapse of American hegemony.
While some take 'multi-polarity' to imply the coexistence of large powers and therefore identify the late 19th century as 'multipolar,' Infrared interprets multi-polarity to refer to a new particularization and regionalization of global hegemony.
Drawing from Alexandre Kojève's notion of the 'universal and homogeneous state,' Infrared interprets multi-polarity in the Hegelian sense of the rise of 'determinate universalism,' as opposed to the 'abstract universalism' characteristic of American super-imperialism. Newly emergent regional poles give globalization a concrete and civilizational character, thus corresponding to the rise of states that are simultaneously universal and particular, global, and regional.
Multi-polarity represents the sublation of the global American system into regional forms, that render it superfluous. Hence in the age of multi-polarity, American hegemony begins to assume the form of naked and brute political domination, characterized by the extraordinary use of military force to preserve a state of affairs outmoded by history. This is in contrast to the nascent American super-imperialism (Hudson) of the postwar Bretton-Woods period, which was characterized by the emergence of a unique global economic system based on strategic application of economic developmentalism to select regions in order mitigate the effects of capitalist crisis.