Ron Paul Maoism: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Ron Paul Maoism''', sometimes referred to alternatively as '''Ron Paul Bolshevism''', is an imbecilic oxymoron concocted by theoretically uneducated [[Infrared]] propagaists and spammers on Twitter. The nature regarding how a proletarian and Socialist ideology, such as Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, and a petite-bourgeois Capitalist ideology, such as Libertarianism, can possibly syndicate is uncertain, but Haz Al-Din will persist in using esoteric lexicon to "prove" such a foolish idea is Marxian, despite him never reading a page of Marxist or even Socialist literature in his life (Note, ''Mein Kampf'' does not count as Socialist nor Marxist theory, despite what the Infrared community may claim).  
'''Ron Paul Maoism''' refers to the intersection between American Libertarianism (represented by [[Ron Paul]]) and [[Communism]]. It was coined by [[Logo Daedalus]] to refer to his belief that if Libertarians consistently pursued their stated political goals (such as ending the Federal Reserve), they would eventually need to become Communist revolutionaries.


Real sources for Maoism may be found [https://www.bannedthought.net/International/RIM/AWTW/1995-20/ll_mlm_20_eng.htm here], do not waste your time on this pseudo-intellectual wordcraft.
==External links==
== External links ==
*Twitter Space by Logo - [https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vAxRAPVXlZJl "Debate Ron Paul Bolshevism"]
* Twitter Space by Logo - [https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1vAxRAPVXlZJl "Debate Ron Paul Bolshevism"]
==References==
== References ==
<references />
<references />
[[Category:Fascism]]
[[Category:Alt-right]]
[[Category:Oxymorons]]
[[Category:Oxymorons]]
[[Category:Libertarianism]]
[[Category:Libertarianism]]

Latest revision as of 14:52, 15 January 2024

Ron Paul Maoism refers to the intersection between American Libertarianism (represented by Ron Paul) and Communism. It was coined by Logo Daedalus to refer to his belief that if Libertarians consistently pursued their stated political goals (such as ending the Federal Reserve), they would eventually need to become Communist revolutionaries.

External links[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]