Jump to content

Stalin-Lydia Affair: Difference between revisions

From InfraWiki
imported>Prolekultur
No edit summary
imported>Azadsingh
m Link
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Stalin-Lydia Affair''' is an unsubstantiated historical controversy surrounding [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin's]] exile to Siberia between 1913-1917, in which bourgeois historians claim that Stalin impregnated 13-year-old Lydia Pereprygina.<ref name=":0">https://x.com/prax_ben/status/1801828255176987134</ref> Ironically, this myth was propagated by pseudo-historian Simon Sebag-Montefoire, an actual pedophile listed on Epstein's black book.<ref>https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/stalin-and-his-lover-aged-13-6581841.html</ref><ref>https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1508273-jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book-redacted</ref> Today, it is used by low-IQ anti-Communist midwits.
The '''Stalin-Lydia Affair''' is an unsubstantiated historical controversy surrounding [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin's]] exile to Siberia between 1913-1917, in which bourgeois historians claim that Stalin impregnated 13-year-old Lydia Pereprygina.<ref name=":0">https://x.com/prax_ben/status/1801828255176987134</ref> Ironically, this myth was propagated by pseudo-historian [[Simon Sebag Montefiore]], an actual pedophile listed on Epstein's black book.<ref>https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/stalin-and-his-lover-aged-13-6581841.html</ref><ref>https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1508273-jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book-redacted</ref> Today, it is used by low-IQ anti-Communist midwits.


==Factual Inconsistencies==
==Factual Inconsistencies==

Latest revision as of 07:14, 10 October 2025

The Stalin-Lydia Affair is an unsubstantiated historical controversy surrounding Stalin's exile to Siberia between 1913-1917, in which bourgeois historians claim that Stalin impregnated 13-year-old Lydia Pereprygina.[1] Ironically, this myth was propagated by pseudo-historian Simon Sebag Montefiore, an actual pedophile listed on Epstein's black book.[2][3] Today, it is used by low-IQ anti-Communist midwits.

Factual Inconsistencies

In February 1913, the Russian secret police, the Okhrana, began to crack down on the Bolsheviks. Stalin was arrested and sent him to exile in Turukhansk, a rural township in Siberia. Worried about future escapes, the Okhrana relocated Stalin to the Arctic village Kureika during Easter 1914.[4] There, Stalin lived with approximately 67 other villagers, including the Pereprygins, a family of orphans. The youngest of the Perepygins was Lydia, who was 13 years old at the time. Sometime in December 1914, Lydia gave birth to a child who died shortly after. In 1917, she gave birth to another child, Alexander Davydov.

According to proponents of the Stalin-Lydia Affair, Stalin fathered both children illegitimately. This is ruled out by the evidence. Because Stalin arrived on April 20th, 1914, and since Lydia had a child sometime that December, the implication of the claim would mean that Lydia had a pregnancy of 7-8 months. Stalin left Kureika for the city of Krasnoyarsk in October 1916, but according to official Russian archives, Davydov was born in November 1917.[5] This means that Lydia should have had the longest recorded pregnancy in history at nearly 400 days. A 13 month pregnancy following a 7-8 month pregnancy is statistically unprecedented and unrealistically anomalous.

Claims that Stalin had any intimacy with Lydia child primarily derive from tabloids and newspapers without scholarly or peer-reviewed oversight.[6] Historian Ronald Suny of the University of Chicago has stated that any claim that Stalin was the father of either child is historically unverifiable.[7] These tabloids themselves admit that Lydia admitted to nothing mentioning a sexual relationship between her and Stalin in her memoirs.[8]

Is the 'DNA Test' accurate?

In 2016, Yuri Davydov, the son of Alexander Davydov, conducted a DNA test in tandem with BioPapa that purportedly showed with 99.98% certainty that Stalin was his grandfather.[9] However, these tests were not carried out through any legal proceedings or under the purview of any court, and is not legally valid by BioPapa's admission.[10]

BioPapa has also been known to forge results.[11] The founder of the company, Evgenia Koplina, admits that clients occasionally offered substantial bribes in order to falsify DNA results.[12] In 2013, a Tajik businessman by the name of Zayd Saidov was charged with rape and supposedly was a father to a child, and the court went through BioPapa to have DNA tests done [Source Needed]. The prosecution requesting the results from BioPapa claimed that the results were not falsified, but Saidov could not get any repeat results or confirmation.