Gangsta King

'Gangsta King' is a term originally coined by Haz in a livestream that took place February 3rd 2023, titled 'My GROUNDBREAKING political theory'. It refers to rulers and leaders in the 21st century who — by their form of exercising authority, statehood, and sovereignty — go against universal enlightenment liberalism. The term is meant to invoke names such as Gaddafi, Maduro, Putin, Xi, Assad or Kim Jong Un.

Theoretical underpinnings

The term serves as a serious political statement presented in a jocular manner, a running theme in Infrared thought, which (partly inspired by Zizek) considers memes a serious conveyer of meaning.

Premodern sovereignty

Mandate from Heaven. Divine right of Kings. Right by inheritance.

The break from premodern sovereignty

The beginning of the end for premodern politics started in the citystates of Italy. In Italy, forms of accumulation began to emerge that operated outside the feudal order. One such system was the various mercantile banks during the 14th and 15th centuries. Families like the Medicis began to delegitimize hereditary or religious claims to power by simply growing their wealth and influence. This material change correpsonded to a shift in the arena of political theory. The french theorist Luis Althusser (foundational to infrared thought), considered The Prince by Machiavelli "the first materialist political philosophy". This is because Machiavelli described relations of power through a non-metaphysical lense.

'Paradise Lost' by John Milton. Hegelian/Zizekian concept of the fall.

After the enlightenment, the ancien regime could no longer legitimize it's own claim to power. Instead we saw the rise of 'universal politics' - for example Codé Napoleon - where everyone by law and in a contractual manner was considered an equal participant of state politics. Open societies.

This gives way to contradictions when material conditions assert themself over the pure form of liberal politics. For example, in western style democracies, we all have the true right to vote, but power itself is somewhere else; Deep states, oligarchies and burocracies.

Malign sovereignty - The so called tyranny and authoritarianism

In todays age, all forms of sovereignty not carried out in the liberal form are considered malign and illegitimate (which literally means 'not approved by law') in the eyes of the liberal establishment. Some even go so far as to claim that all forms of non-liberal government are fascistic; One example being leftists/anarchists calling the Soviet Union or China red fascist. The more popular one however, is the accusation of authoritarianism or tyranny.

'Gangsta Kings'break the rules of liberalism by concentrating their power in non judicial forms, which allows them to challenge and crack down on the oligarchs oppressing the people, dialectically making the average individual more free. The dialectical relationship in question is that centralization on one level neccesserily corresponds to a decentralizaton on the other. In its socialist context the topic has been addressed in the Infrared vision videos: 'Stalin: What They Don't Teach You in School' and 'The Unknown Cultural Revolution'.

This class based dialectic is well established in history. Machiavelli mentions in The Prince how local lords oppress their subjects, while powerful kings can be uplifted by the people as saviours. In Michael Parentis work The Assassination of Julius Caesar: A People's History of ancient rome', he expands upon the class struggle in ancient rome between the elites and the people, represented by Julius Ceasar.

In its modern context, Xi has led his anti-corruption campaign in China, cracking down on party members and business owners. When Putin took power he nationalized the energy, refinanced pension programes and other benefits, while cracking down on critical oligarchs.

Within the context of the class struggle