Editing Europa: The Last Battle

From InfraWiki
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Europa: The Last Battle''' is a ten-part series made by Swedish neo-Nazi Tobias Bratt. It is focused on Nazi apologia, historical revisionism and conspiracy theories about Jews and [[Communism]]. It's composed of wholly unfounded and sourceless claims mixed in with known historical facts, which makes it hard for the average person to seperate truth from falsehood. Normally, sourceless claims can be dissmissed without investigation, but since it's widely cited by neo-Nazis on the internet, we have taken it upon ourselves to take every claim seriously and investigate it as if it were true.
'''Europa: The Last Battle''' is a ten-part series made by swedish neonazi Tobias Bratt. It is focused on Nazi apologia, historical revisionism and conspiracy theories about jews and communism. It's composed of wholly unfounded and sourceless claims mixed in with known historical facts, which makes it hard for the average person to seperate truth from falsehood. Normally, sourceless claims can be dissmissed without investigation, but since it's widely cited by neonazis on the internet, we have taken it upon ourselfs to take every claim seriously, and investigate it as if it were true.


All good propaganda contains a grain of truth. To lie is very easy, but the truth requires close study. We in the infrared collective are commited to the final and most complete truth. This page will serve as a master page for '''debunking Europa: The Last Battle.''' This time, with real sources.  
All good propaganda contains a grain of truth. To lie is very easy, but the truth requires close study. We in the infrared collective are commited to the final and most complete truth. This page will serve as a master page for '''debunking Europa: The Last Battle.''' This time, with real sources.  
Line 20: Line 20:


====== "Hess converted them to communism and assisted them with their work The Communist Manifesto" ======
====== "Hess converted them to communism and assisted them with their work The Communist Manifesto" ======
Hess first came into contact with Marx in 1842 - working together on a newspaper in the intellectual, communist environment of Paris - and their relationship was quite the opposite, Marx was the teacher of Hess.<ref>"[Marx] goes beyond Strauss and even beyond Feuerbach . . . Such a man I always wanted to have as my teacher in philosophy. Only now do I feel what an idiot in philosophy have I been. But patience! I will still learn something. Dr Marx – this is the name of my idol" - A letter to Berthold Auerbach by Moses Hess
Hess first came into contact with Marx in 1942 - working together on a newspaper in the intellectual, communist environment of Paris - and their relationship was quite the opposite, Marx was the teacher of Hess.<ref>"[Marx] goes beyond Strauss and even beyond Feuerbach . . . Such a man I always wanted to have as my teacher in philosophy. Only now do I feel what an idiot in philosophy have I been. But patience! I will still learn something. Dr Marx – this is the name of my idol" - A letter to Berthold Auerbach by Moses Hess


https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf</ref> Marx early writings are available here,<ref>https://files.libcom.org/files/Marx-Early-Writings.pdf</ref> where he slowely lands in the conclusion of communism, from an entirely different angle, a materialist one, than Hess. Marx writes that he was influenced not only by Hess, but by French and English socialists which were utopian Christians, furthermore by Weitling (the leader of League of the Just founded 1836) and Engels - who together with Hess were the only Germans to translate French communist ideas into German.<ref>https://philarchive.org/archive/KOVMHM<nowiki/>Economic Manuscripts (1844)
https://assets.cambridge.org/052138/7566/frontmatter/0521387566_frontmatter.pdf</ref> Marx early writings are available here,<ref>https://files.libcom.org/files/Marx-Early-Writings.pdf</ref> where he slowely lands in the conclusion of communism, from an entirely different angle, a materialist one, than Hess. Marx writes that he was influenced not only by Hess, but by French and English socialists which were utopian Christians, furthermore by Weitling and Engels - who together with Hess were the only Germans to translate French communist ideas into German.<ref>https://philarchive.org/archive/KOVMHM<nowiki/>Economic Manuscripts (1844)


"It goes without saying that besided the French and English socialists, I have also used German socialist works. The only ''original'' German works of substance in this science, however, - other than Weitling's writings - are the essays by ''Hess...'' and Engels"</ref> While Hess definitely influenced both on the subject of money and alienation by loss of communal property, the narrative is deeply misconstrued. Hess came to his conclusion from a theological perspective, money as separation from god, while Marx and Engels where materialists. Furthermore, when Marx and Engels wrote the communist manifesto, they would critique Hess's utopian form of communism. '''Verdict''': False
"It goes without saying that besided the French and English socialists, I have also used German socialist works. The only ''original'' German works of substance in this science, however, - other than Weitling's writings - are the essays by ''Hess...'' and Engels"</ref> While Hess definitely influenced both on the subject of money and alienation by loss of communal property, the narrative is deeply misconstrued. Hess came to his conclusion from a theological perspective, money as separation from god, while Marx and Engels where materialists. Furthermore, when Marx and Engels wrote the communist manifesto, they would critique Hess's utopian form of communism. '''Verdict''': False  


===== Claim (06:40): Marx openly encouraged genocide against Slavs, referring to them as "racial trash". =====
===== Claim (06:40): Marx openly encouraged genocide against Slavs, referring to them as "racial trash". =====
Line 57: Line 57:


===== Claim (17:47): The Federal Reserve was now controlled by jews, Warburg, Schiff and the Rothschilds =====
===== Claim (17:47): The Federal Reserve was now controlled by jews, Warburg, Schiff and the Rothschilds =====
As of 2018, the two largest holders of the New York Fed by far are Citibank, formerly National City Bank of the Rockefellers, with 42.8% of shares, and JPMorgan Chase, with 29.5%.
As of 2018, the two largest holders by far are Citibank, formerly National City Bank of the Rockefellers, with 42.8% of shares, and JPMorgan Chase, with 29.5%.


===== Claim (17:50): Every federal reserve chairman since 1980 has been jewish =====
===== Claim (17:50): Every federal reserve chairman since 1980 has been jewish =====
Line 73: Line 73:


===== Claim (20:20): According to state department documents, a group of jews, including Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, '''Otto [Hermann] Kahn, Mortimer L. Schiff, Issac Zeelman, already planned the overthrow of the russian tsar in 1916. They decided that Russia should be destroyed, and a communist slave regime should be implemented''' =====
===== Claim (20:20): According to state department documents, a group of jews, including Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, '''Otto [Hermann] Kahn, Mortimer L. Schiff, Issac Zeelman, already planned the overthrow of the russian tsar in 1916. They decided that Russia should be destroyed, and a communist slave regime should be implemented''' =====
This claim has it's origins in a report titled ''"Bolshevism and Judaism"'' dated November 30, 1918. The report details the belief that the planning for the Bolshevik Revolution first began in February 1916, with the help of four prominent jewish bankers. The author is identified only as a "Top Secret Informant", and a sum total of zero sources are cited.<ref>“Bolshevism and Judaism,” November 30, 1918, 10110-920
This claim has it's origins in a report titled ''"Bolshevism and Judaism"'' dated November 12, 1918. The report details the belief that the planning for the Bolshevik Revolution first began in February 1916, with the help of four prominent jewish bankers. The author is identified only as a "Top Secret Informant"
 
National Archives</ref> Nonetheless, copies and imitations of the original source began to pop up in newspapers, spreading its authorative effect.
 
We can however note that, of course, all Jews were hostile to the Russian Empire, Schiff had previously funded the japanese war effort against it. But, as expected of bankers, Schiff was also hostile toward socialism. More on that later. So to be clear, it's '''one''' document, unnamed author with unsourced claims, and it aroused no further investigation from state organs. It does not prove that "they decided a communist regime should be implemented" '''Verdict:''' False


===== Claim (20:51): [Communism was] funded by jewish bankers... and manifested by jewish bolsheviks: Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Yagoda. =====
===== Claim (20:51): [Communism was] funded by jewish bankers... and manifested by jewish bolsheviks: Vladimir Lenin, Trotsky, Kaganovich, Yagoda. =====
This section is specifically targeting the claim that Lenin was Jewish.
This section is specifically targeting the claim that Lenin was Jewish.
Many point to the claim that Lenin himself - the founder of Bolshevism in the first place, was supposedly a quarter Jewish. Even if this were true, the very ‘source’ used as proof for it, admits that he was unaware of the fact. But actually this claim, while widespread even among the liberal establishment, is dubious and almost certainly false. This claim comes from a deliberately distorted document of his pedigree, which, ironically, Zionists picked up after the 1990’s. Why?
Because the notion of Lenin having Jewish ancestry was unfounded throughout the entirety of the Soviet Union. So Zionists, seeking to smear the Soviets as ‘anti-semitic,’ found it convenient to team-up with Neo-Nazis to spread the lie that Soviet authorities ‘covered up’ his ‘real ancestry.’ Zionists saw this as evidence they were ‘anti-semitic,’ and Neo-Nazis that they were ‘Jewish’ themselves.<ref>http://ldn-knigi.lib.ru/JUDAICA/Evrei-Rossii_1917-1924.htm</ref>


===== Claim (21:50): the Bolsheviks forced the Tsar to abdicate =====
===== Claim (21:50): the Bolsheviks forced the Tsar to abdicate =====
The Tsar abdicated in March, the bolsheviks had no state power to speak off up until the October revolution. Maybe the director thought this extremely basic fact could just be ignored in favour of a metanarrative. '''Verdict:''' False
The Tsar abdicated in March, the bolsheviks had no state power to speak off up until the October revolution. '''Verdict:''' False


===== '''Claim (22:00):''' 1. Kerensky was given a million dollars from the wall street banker Jacob Schiff... 2. to free all political prisoners and permit exiles to return to Russia =====
===== '''Claim (22:00):''' 1. Kerensky was given a million dollars from the wall street banker Jacob Schiff... 2. to free all political prisoners and permit exiles to return to Russia =====
Schiff floated loans worth at least a million dollars to Kerensky. The Kerensky government ordered an immediate amnesty for all political and religious prisoners, along with other reforms such as freedom of press. There is, however, nothing linking this specific policy to any demand or wish by Schiff. Schiff wanted the persecution of Jews to stop, but that is a religious - not a political - prisoner. Furthermore, the dictator Kerensky soon started '''cracking down''' on the bolsheviks. For their anti-war stance they were charged with treason by the Ministry of Justice, hundreds were arrested.<ref>Buttar, Prit (2017). ''Russia's Last Gasp: The Eastern Front 1916-17''.</ref> Schiff, however, was in favour of the continued war effort against germany. How does that fit into the narrative? '''Verdict: 1.''' True '''2.''' False
The Kerensky government ordered an immediate amnesty for all political and religious prisoners, along with other reforms such as freedom of press. There is, however, nothing linking this specific policy to any demand or wish by Schiff. Schiff wanted the persecution of Jews to stop, but that is a religious - not a political - prisoner. Furthermore, the dictator Kerensky soon started '''cracking down''' on the bolsheviks. For their anti-war stance they were charged with treason by the Ministry of Justice, hundreds were arrested.<ref>Buttar, Prit (2017). ''Russia's Last Gasp: The Eastern Front 1916-17''.</ref> How does that fit into the narrative? '''Verdict: 1.''' True '''2.''' False


===== Claim (22:17): Jacob Schiff was chairman of the Kuhn Loeb bank, and assistant of the Rothschilds =====
===== Claim (22:17): Jacob Schiff was chairman of the Kuhn Loeb bank, and assistant of the Rothschilds =====
Line 101: Line 93:
January 20, 1918
January 20, 1918


https://www.nytimes.com/1918/01/20/archives/what-trotzky-did-when-in-new-york-investigation-for-department-of.html</ref> "I have been unable to establish a single 'indication' that Trotsky received money from any German donor," Baker concluded. To add to this, Trotsky was also searched by Canadian border guards when he boarded the ship to Europe at Halifax, and they did not find any money significant enough to report. Simple reason allows us to dismiss this claim right now, but we can go further. At the time when Trotsky was planning his leave to Russia (March 1917), Schiff was on the other side of the country, in White Sulfur Springs of West Virginia.<ref>''New York Times,'' March 18, 1917</ref>
https://www.nytimes.com/1918/01/20/archives/what-trotzky-did-when-in-new-york-investigation-for-department-of.html</ref> "I have been unable to establish a single 'indication' that Trotsky received money from any German donor," Baker concluded.


Anthony Sutton, who was himself adament to "JQ" the bolshevik revolution, could not find supporting evidence of Jacob Schiff funding the bolsheviks: "[U.S. State Department files] ''confirm that the investment banker Jacob Schiff, often cited as a source of funds for the Bolshevik Revolution, was in fact against support of the Bolshevik régime''.”<ref>Sutton, “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution.” p 33.
Anthony Sutton, who was himself adament to "JQ" the bolshevik revolution, could not find supporting evidence of Jacob Schiff funding the bolsheviks: "[U.S. State Department files] ''confirm that the investment banker Jacob Schiff, often cited as a source of funds for the Bolshevik Revolution, was in fact against support of the Bolshevik régime''.”<ref>Sutton, “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution.” p 33.


Retrieved from: https://www.schiffnaturepreserve.org/JacobSchiffEssay.pdf</ref> Schiff's anti-bolshevism is also noted in the book: ''"Jacob H. Schiff A Study in American Jewish Leadership"'' by W. Cohen, chapter 7: after the bolsheviks took power, Schiff demanded that the money intended for Kerensky be sent back.
Retrieved from: https://www.schiffnaturepreserve.org/JacobSchiffEssay.pdf</ref>


The origins of the claim (Trotsky taking money from bankers) are hard to pin down. Perhaps they can be found here: During a public hearing held by a U.S. Senate subcommittee to investigate "Bolshevik influence in the United States." A Czech military attaché named VS Hurban, who was stationed in Russia in 1917, mentioned this in his testimony about the Bolshevik leader: ''"Trotsky may have taken money from Germany, but he will deny it,"'' he told the senators. ''"Miliukov has confirmed that Trotsky received '''$10,000''' from some Germans while in the United States. Miliukov has evidence, but Trotsky denies it."''<ref>Hearing on “Brewing and Liquor Interests and German and Bolshevik Propaganda," Committee on Judiciary, United States Senate, 65th Congress, 1919, quoted in Sutton, 23.</ref> Subcommittee Chairman, North Carolina Democratic Senator Councilman Lee Overman asked for details, but Helbang brushed him off. The subcommittee adjourned that day, and senators never reopened the issue. According to the same book by W. Cohen mentioned earlier, that number of $10,000 was raised to $10,000,000 and later $20,000,000, all leading back to two original sources, "''Bolshevism and Judaism"'' and the senate subcommittee.
===== On the nature of Jacob Schiffs relationship to the Russian revolutions: =====
 
"Schiff's gripe against Russia had been its anti-Semitism. At home Schiff had never shown any sympathy for socialism, not even the milder Morris Hillquit variety. Schiff had declared victory for his purposes in Russia after the tsar was toppled in March 1917 and Alexander Kerensky, representing the new provisional government, had declared Jews to be equal citizens. In addition to repeated public statements of support, he used both his personal wealth and the resources of Kuhn Loeb to float large loans to Kerensky's regime. When Lenin and Trotsky seized power for themselves in November 1917, '''Schiff''' immediately rejected them, cut off further loans, '''started funding anti-Bolshevist groups''', and even demanded that the Bolsheviks pay back some of the money he'd loaned Kerensky. Schiff also joined a British-backed effort to appeal to fellow Jews in Russia to continue the fight against Germany."<ref>https://www.marxists.org/chinese/trotsky/trotsky-in-new-york-1917/27.htm</ref>
Example of fake quote: "In the United States, some of Trotsky's wealthy partisans donated as much as $25,000 to finance a printing press and meeting halls for the dispossessed politician." Allegedly Page 389 of Deutscher, Isaac. The Prophet Outcast: Trotsky 1929-1940. However, nowhere to be found.<ref>https://archive.org/details/prophetoutcasttr0000deut/page/388/mode/2up?q=Page+389</ref>
 
'''Verdict''': False


===== On the nature of Jacob Schiffs relationship to the Russian revolutions: =====
* Ackerman, Kenneth (2016). Trotsky in New York, 1917: A Radical on the Eve of Revolution.
"Schiff's gripe against Russia had been its anti-Semitism. At home Schiff had never shown any sympathy for socialism, not even the milder Morris Hillquit variety. Schiff had declared victory for his purposes in Russia after the tsar was toppled in March 1917 and Alexander Kerensky, representing the new provisional government, had declared Jews to be equal citizens. In addition to repeated public statements of support, he used both his personal wealth and the resources of Kuhn Loeb to float large loans to Kerensky's regime. When Lenin and Trotsky seized power for themselves in November 1917, '''Schiff''' immediately rejected them, cut off further loans, '''started funding anti-Bolshevist groups''', and even demanded that the Bolsheviks pay back some of the money he'd loaned Kerensky. Schiff also joined a British-backed effort to appeal to fellow Jews in Russia to continue the fight against Germany." - Ackerman, Kenneth (2016). Trotsky in New York, 1917: A Radical on the Eve of Revolution.<ref>https://www.marxists.org/chinese/trotsky/trotsky-in-new-york-1917/27.htm</ref>


Jacob Schiff is often invoked in judeobolshevik conspiracy theories, with intentional lying employed about sources meant to support the claims. For example in: In "''Men who are making America''", page 335, it reads that Schiff once donated $100 000 to a set up a war relief hospital in Russia,<ref>https://archive.org/details/menwhoaremaking00forbgoog/page/n425/mode/2up</ref> in summer of 1917 before the October revolution had occured. Gary Allen cited the same page in his book "''None Dare Call it Conspiracy"'' and used it to support the claim that Schiff gave a donation of $10 million to the bolsheviks.<ref>https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=allen&book=none&story=bankroll#:~:text=later%20married%20Trotsky.%22-,Schiff,-spent%20millions%20to<nowiki/>The claim:
Jacob Schiff is often invoked in judeobolshevik conspiracy theories, with intentional lying employed about sources meant to support the claims. For example in: In "''Men who are making America''", page 335, it reads that Schiff once donated $100 000 to a set up a war relief hospital in Russia,<ref>https://archive.org/details/menwhoaremaking00forbgoog/page/n425/mode/2up</ref> in summer of 1917 before the October revolution had occured. Gary Allen cited the same page in his book "''None Dare Call it Conspiracy"'' and used it to support the claim that Schiff gave a donation of $10 million to the bolsheviks.<ref>https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=allen&book=none&story=bankroll#:~:text=later%20married%20Trotsky.%22-,Schiff,-spent%20millions%20to<nowiki/>The claim:
Please note that all contributions to InfraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Meta:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)