Search
Toggle search
Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Editing
Marxists Behaving Badly
(section)
From InfraWiki
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Page
Discussion
More actions
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 2. Stalinism ==== Just as Leon Trotsky was the first to apply the term “totalitarian” to the USSR during the period of [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]’s leadership, so he was the first to use the term "Stalinism". The Oxford English Dictionary identifies the first use of the word "Stalinism" in the English language:<blockquote>1927 Daily Tel.22 Nov. 10/3: A violent denunciation of ‘Stalinism’ and its ‘terrorising of the party’.</blockquote>This is reference to an article about the activities of Trotsky and other Oppositionists during and after the November 7, 1927, celebrations of the 10th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. The scare quotes indicate that the paper is quoting the Oppositionists. The Trotskyist site Marxists.org joins overtly pro-capitalist writers in stating:<blockquote>... '''Stalinism lastedlonger and was more total''' than fascism. But '''fascism and Stalinism shared in common...that they rested on absolute terror''' ... (ibid.)</blockquote>Marxists.org recognizes that “Stalinism” does not have any fixed meaning:<blockquote>...getting at the core definition of “Stalinism” [is] difficult, but not impossible.<ref>At <https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/s/t.htm#stalinism>.</ref> The political tenets of Stalinism revolve around '''the theory of socialism in one country–developed by Stalin to counter <u>the Bolshevik theory</u> that the survival of the Russian Revolution depended on proletarian revolutions in Europe.''' In contradistinction, the Stalinist theory stipulates that a socialist society can be achieved within a single country.</blockquote>This is false. Marxists.org continues [emphasis [[Grover Furr|mine]]]: In April 1924, in the first edition of his book ''[https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/index.htm Foundations of Leninism]'', Stalin had explicitly rejected the idea that socialism could be constructed in one country. He wrote: “Is it possible to attain '''the ''final'' victory of socialism''' in one country, without the combined efforts of the proletarians of several advanced countries? No, it is not.” ... by November 1926, Stalin had completely revised history, stating: “The party always took as its starting point the idea that the victory of socialism ... can be accomplished with the forces of a single country.” (ibid.) Note that in this last quotation Stalin spoke of “the victory of socialism,” not “the ''final'' victory of socialism” as he did in the quotation from 1924. Lest this appear as “hair-splitting,” an example of my own confirmation bias, note that in the “Short Course,” published in Russian in 1938 and in English in 1939, we read [emphasis [[Grover Furr|mine]]]:<blockquote>... '''the victory of Socialism in the U.S.S.R.''', as expressed in the abolition of the capitalist economic system and the building of a Socialist economic system, '''could not be considered a ''final'' victory'''...<ref>History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolseviks). Short Course. (New York, 1939). Chapter Nine. At <https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1939/x01/ch09.htm>.</ref></blockquote>The Marxists.com writers include this text on their site but they are ignoring it. Either they are intentionally deceiving their readers, or this is an example of their own confirmation bias. Their conclusion, therefore, that Stalin had abandoned “the Bolshevik theory that the survival of the Russian Revolution depended on proletarian revolutions in Europe” is invalid, a sign of prejudice rather than objectivity. The Marxists.org article claims that Lenin rejected the idea of “socialism in one country.” This too is false. In reality, Lenin clearly stated that socialism ''could'' be achieved in one country.<blockquote>Uneven economic and political development is an absolute law of capitalism. '''Hence, the victory of socialism is possible first in several or even in one capitalist country alone.''' (“'''[https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1915/aug/23.htm The United States of Europe Slogan]''',” 1915)<ref>At <https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1915/aug/23.htm>.</ref> The development of capitalism proceeds extremely unevenly in different countries. It cannot be otherwise under commodity production. From this it follows irrefutably that '''socialism cannot achieve victory simultaneously in all countries. It will achieve victory first in one or several countries''', while the others will for some time remain bourgeois or pre-bourgeois. (“'''[https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/miliprog/i.htm The Military Programme of the Proletarian Revolution]''',” 1916)<ref>At <https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/miliprog/i.htm>.</ref> Indeed, the power of the state over all large-scale means of production, political power in the hands of the proletariat, the alliance of this proletariat with the many millions of small and very small peasants, the assured proletarian leadership of the peasantry, etc. ... '''Is this not all that is necessary to build a complete socialist society? It is still not the building of socialist society, but it is all that is necessary and sufficient for it.''' (“'''[https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1923/jan/06.htm On Co-operation]''',” dated January 6, 1923; published in Pravda May 26, 1923)<ref>At <https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1923/jan/06.htm>.</ref></blockquote>These citations of Lenin, and the works from which they are taken, are all on the Marxists.org site. The Marxist.org writers have access to all these quotations, but their anti-Stalin paradigm acts as an obstacle keeping them from integrating these texts into their thinking –assuming they are not being deliberately dishonest. They should know that Lenin supported the theory of “socialism in one country” and that it was Stalin, not Trotsky, who was following Lenin’s theory in this regard.Once again, either the Marxist.org writers are victims of their own confirmation bias,or they are deliberately lying to their readers. Do the Marxists.org writers rely on any evidence? Well, Trotsky claimed that [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]] rejected the idea of “socialism in one country.” That’s it!Just a claim by Trotsky, which is sufficient to reinforce their pre-existing prejudice against Stalin, and which takes the form that “Stalinism had uprooted the very foundations of Marxism and Leninism.” In reality, in light of Lenin’s endorsement of “socialism in one country” it was Trotsky, not Stalin, who had “uprooted” Leninism! Most readers of Marxists.org know little or nothing about Soviet history, and so are vulnerable to anti-Stalin, pro-Trotsky falsifications. Of course Lenin’s writings should not be worshipped and regarded as errorless. In this case Marxists.org try to employ Lenin’s writings in a dishonest charge against Stalin.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to InfraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Meta:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)